Editor, Author at SCC Times

Ker HC | Mere issuance of summon under S. 50(2) of PMLA 2002, to state the truth or make statements does not infringe the right of anyone: No cause of action arise under Art. 226

Kerala High Court: V. G. Arun, J., dismissed the instant petition filed by the petitioner, the Additional Private Secretary to the Chief

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

CESTAT | Whether a by-product from a factory be considered as manufactured goods and should it fall under ‘excisable goods’ or ‘exempted goods’ as provided in R. 2(d) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004; Tribunal answers while dismissing appeal

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Dilip Gupta (President) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) dismissed an

Case Briefs High Courts

P&H HC | There could be no blanket rule that concurrent findings cannot be interfered with in the second appeal; It is more a rule of caution and less a rule of law; HC explains

Punjab and Haryana High Court: Rajbir Sehrawat, J., allowed the instant second appeal challenging the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the

Case Briefs High Courts

Ker HC | Even if the Bank is a public sector bank, writ petition under Art. 226 is not maintainable if act in question is not one involving any element of public duty

Kerala High Court: P.V. Asha, J. allowed the writ petition questioning status of IDBI Bank as “State” under Article 12 of the

Case Briefs High Courts

Gau HC | [Service Law] Suspension order cannot continue beyond three months without filing of charge sheet against the alleged officer or employee; HC reiterates

Gauhati High Court: Manojit Bhuyan, J., while allowing the present petition, directed to reinstate the petitioner on and from the date when

Case Briefs High Courts

HP HC | Creation or bifurcation of Gram Panchayat is essentially a policy matter, falling in the exclusive domain and jurisdiction of the State; Petition dismissed

Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Sandeep Sharma, JJ., while dismissing the present petition upon lack

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

SAT | The strategy of ‘momentum trading’ is about creating its own momentum inimical to the interest of the securities market and is violative of PFUTP regulations

Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):The Bench of Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer), Justice M. T. Joshi and Dr C. K. G. Nair Member

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

CESTAT | Whether R. 6(4) credit of capital goods admissible if the production and clearance of dutiable goods takes place within two years from the date of commencement of production; Tribunal explains while allowing the appeal

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Dilip Gupta (President) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) allowed an

New releases News

An Overview of the Panel Discussion on”4 Years of IBC – The Revolution Witnessed and the Promise for Future” [Watch the Panel Discussion]

A panel discussion on “4 Years of IBC – The Revolution Witnessed and the Promise for Future” was held on 12th December,

Case Briefs High Courts

Chh HC | Whether the ‘bank account’ falls within the term “property” under S. 102 (1) CrPC? HC elaborates in regard to the settled position of law

Chhattisgarh High Court: Sanjay K Agrawal J., dismissed the petition holding that bank account is considered as property within the meaning of

Case Briefs High Courts

[NI Act]Kar HC | If the complainant produces evidence regarding the transaction as well as dishonour of cheque, is it still necessary to examine the banker to prove the endorsement issued by him? HC decides

Karnataka High Court: John Michael Cunha J., allowed the appeal and sets aside the impugned order. The case involves default under Section

Case Briefs High Courts

Jhar HC | [Article 300-A] A person cannot be deprived of his property merely by executive fiat without any specific legal authority or without the support of law made by a competent legislature; Petition allowed

Jharkhand High Court: Rajesh Shankar, J., quashing the impugned letter, held, “The respondent 5 being an administrative/revenue Officer is supposed to know

Case Briefs High Courts

Chh HC | Sentence reduced for offence punishable under S. 498 A IPC due to the sentence already undergone and having no criminal antecedent; Appeal allowed

Chhattisgarh High Court: Arvind Singh Chandel J., allowed the appeal and reduced the sentence to the period already undergone by the petitioner

OP. ED.SCC Journal Section Archives

The Dawn of Human Rights Jurisprudence — A Tribute to the Judicial Statesmanship and Activism of Chief Justice P.N. Bhagwati

by N.R. Madhava Menon

Case Briefs High Courts

J&K HC | Non-applicant cannot be convicted on the statement of co-accused recorded under S. 67 of the NDPS Act, 1985; Application dismissed

Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Division Bench of Sanjay Dhar and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. while dismissing the present application seeking leave

Case Briefs Tribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

CESTAT | Cenvat Credit including Education Cess and SHE cess taken on R&D services entitled to be distributed; Tribunal allows appeal

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of P.V. Subba Rao (Technical Member) and P. Dinesha (Judicial Member) allowed

Case Briefs High Courts

[NI Act] Kar HC | In a case where both the complainant and the accused remained continuously absent, Court ought to have “dismissed the complaint for non prosecution under S. 256 CrPC and not on merits”

Karnataka High Court: John Michael Cunha J., allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment. The case involves default under Section

Case Briefs High Courts

Jhar HC | Whether Speaker has the power to take suo moto cognizance to treat a case under Schedule X of the Constitution; HC enumerates

Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of Dr Ravi Ranjan, CJ. and Sujit Narayan Prasad, J., allowing the present petition, discussed the

Case Briefs High Courts

Kar HC | Interpreting the term ‘enquiry’ under S. 43A of Karnataka Panchayatraj Act 1993, Court lays strict emphasis on procedural compliance before any State Action of removal; Petition allowed

Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of G. Narendar and M.I. Arun JJ., allowing the present petition, discussed the meaning, scope and

Case Briefs High Courts

Gau HC | No blanket order of appointment can be passed in favour of any ‘Affected Candidate’ in terms of Rule 2(a) of the Assam Public Service (Preferential Appointment) Rules, 1999; HC clarifies

Gauhati High Court: Manojit Bhuyan J., simplifying the applicability of Rule 3 and Rule 4 of Assam Public Service (Preferential Appointment) Rules,