Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
The complainant’s insured vehicle was damaged in a fire and the first surveyor assessed the loss at ₹4,68,000, against ₹4,00,000 assessed by a subsequent surveyor.
Continue reading
Commission held that Amazon cannot shelter behind its marketplace role and an OTP delivery record where the delivered parcel held e-waste instead of a laptop worth ₹1,29,990.
Continue reading
Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, upheld a railway employee’s transfer from Prayagraj to Fatehpur, finding independent administrative grounds and no mala fides despite a leave dispute.
Continue reading
NCLT Mumbai found the Istisna and Wakala arrangement financial, and the claimed goods could not be found.
Continue reading
The Commission observed that the supplementary tariff on account of the installation of the ECS/FGD system shall be payable by the Respondents to the Petitioner.
Continue reading
“The case of the Revenue, which is based on documents retrieved from CPUs, computers or pen drives and various statements recorded during the course of investigation, which have been found to be inadmissible as evidence, to allege clandestine removal of goods, cannot be sustained.”
Continue reading
The Central Information Commission held that “a general assertion of confidentiality or fiduciary capacity cannot substitute the statutory requirement of demonstrating the applicability of an exemption”.
Continue reading
Holding that Rapido’s pre-ride tipping prompts misled consumers into believing that additional payments would improve ride availability and confirmation, the CCPA found the practice to constitute misleading advertisements, an unfair trade practice and prohibited dark pattern.
Continue reading
“…Section 10A contains a non-obstante bar against filing an application under Sections 7, 9 or 10 in respect of a default arising on or after 25.03.2020, during the prescribed period extended up to 24.03.2021. The proviso makes the bar permanent by providing that “no application shall ever be filed” for initiation of CIRP in respect of such default. The Explanation clarifies that Section 10A does not apply to a default committed before 25.03.2020. Accordingly, determination of the precise date of default assumes decisive significance, as a default falling within the protected period attracts a permanent statutory bar.”
Continue reading
“There is a substance in the application. Thus, we intend to allow the same.”
Continue reading
“…the mere fact that one proceeding was instituted earlier cannot, by itself, be determinative of the Court before which the connected proceedings ought to continue. The subsequent course of proceedings is also relevant while considering the appropriate forum for transfer.”
Continue reading
“It is noteworthy that when any Rules/Bye Laws are found inconsistent with the RTI Act, 2005 then the non-obstante clause of Section 22 becomes operative.”
Continue reading
The NHRC has issued notices to the police authorities concerned, seeking a detailed report within two weeks, including the investigation status and compensation, if any, paid to the victim.
Continue reading
While finding that “A Recent Entrance to Paradise” satisfies the limited threshold of “originality” under Section 13, the Copyright Office held that DABUS cannot be entered as an author under Section 2(d)(vi).
Continue reading
NCLT New Delhi treats an unadmitted Section 9 petition as a matter between the parties alone, permitting its withdrawal while declining to endorse the settlement itself, given the airline’s other pending insolvency cases.
Continue reading
NCLT observed that it is not endowed with the powers of jurisdiction or authority to analyse or evaluate the commercial decision of the CoC.
Continue reading
The Tribunal held that the proviso inserted to Section 112(8) of the CGST Act by the Finance Act, 2025 does not operate retrospectively. Since the proceedings had commenced prior to 01-10-2025, the appellant’s vested right of appeal could not be burdened by a subsequently introduced condition requiring pre-deposit of 10 % of the penalty.
Continue reading
“The Tribunal held that a vested stock option does not itself constitute a ‘specified security’ under Section 17(2)(vi). The charging provision is triggered only upon exercise of the option and allotment of shares. Until then, the employee holds only a capital asset in the nature of a right to subscribe to shares, and its transfer is chargeable under the head ‘Capital Gains’.
Continue reading
The NCDRC admitted two consumer complaints citing allegations of misrepresentation, an improperly procured Occupation Certificate, and arbitrary demands by the developer. The developer undertook not to cancel any complainant’s allotment without the Commission’s leave, granting homebuyers interim protection, with the matters listed for 26 October 2026.
Continue reading
Written statement was e-filed within 44 days from the receipt of the complaint which was beyond 30 days prescribed time-limit but the delay beyond 30 days held to be extendable if sufficient cause explained, thus making the prescribed period to be of 45 days. The written statement was thus filed within the prescribed period.
Continue reading