sensational crime
Cases ReportedSCC Archives

“The survival of an orderly society demands the extinction of the life of persons like Ranga and Billa who are a menace to social order and security. They are professional murderers and deserve no sympathy even in terms of the evolving standards of decency of a maturing society.”

Continue reading
Cases ReportedSCC Archives

In Ram Rattan v. State of U.P., (1977) 1 SCC 188, the 3-judges Bench comprising S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, P.N. Bhagwati, and V.R. Krishnaiyer, JJ., delved into the scope of a trespasser to exercise the right of private defence of property and person.

Continue reading
Cases ReportedSCC Archives

In Union of India v. W.N. Chadha,1993 Supp (4) SCC 260, the bench of S. Ratnavel Pandian and K. Jayachandra Reddy, JJ explained the exclusion of the application of the principle of audi alteram partem in relation to an accused at the stage of investigation.

Continue reading
Cases ReportedSCC Archives

In Himalayan Coop. Group Housing Society v. Balwan Singh, (2015) 7 SCC 373 a three-judge Bench of the then CJI Justice HL

Continue reading
Cases ReportedSCC Archives

The bench of Ashok Bhushan* and KM Joseph, JJ, in Basalingappa v. Mudibasappa (2019) 5 SCC 418, lucidly summarized the following principles relating to the

Continue reading
Cases ReportedSCC Archives

“Political agenda of an individual or a political party should not be subversive of rule of law.”

Continue reading
Cases ReportedSCC Archives

In 2011, the bench of RV Raveendran and Markandey Katju, JJ laid down principles relating to promotion and upgradation.

Continue reading
Cases ReportedSCC Archives

In Vikram Greentech (I) Ltd. v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., (2009) 5 SCC 599, the bench of DK Jain and RM

Continue reading
Cases ReportedSCC Archives

In Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra, (1984) 4 SCC 116, the bench of S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, A. Varadarajan and Sabyasachi

Continue reading