Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment on execution of decree against firm dating back to the year 1954.
Dr Rana was previously the Additional Secretary in the Department of Legal Affairs.
The Supreme Court Collegium, headed by Justice Sanjiv Khanna, CJI, in its meeting held on 06-3-2025, recommended the name of Justice Bagchi for the Supreme Court.
The Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal’s decision entitling appellants to be considered as part of the “initial constitution” of Sports Authority of India (SAI) as laid down in the 2022 Rules.
This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment on actionable claim dating back to the year 1954.
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment on execution of decree against firm dating back to the year 1954.
The grievance of the petitioner Bank is that notwithstanding the favourable order dated 29-06-2022, the adverse remarks recorded in the order dated 04-06-2022 continue to cause irreparable harm to the petitioner Bank’s reputation and interests.
by Ashish Deep Verma*
The plaintiff uses the mark ‘JANGEER’, whereas the mark of the defendant includes an ‘I’ in place of ‘EE’ and ‘D’ in place of ‘R’ i.e., ‘JANGID’. Apart from the difference in the spellings of the marks of the plaintiff and the defendant, the manner and style of writing is also completely different. The added features in the defendant’s mark make it quite distinct from the plaintiff’s mark.
“A government employee cannot claim promotion as a matter of right and he can only be considered for promotion according to the extant Rules.”
