Insolvency process
Experts CornerNumen Law Offices

by Lakshmi Raman*

National Company Law Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“Decision taken by the CoC for liquidation in commercial wisdom of the CoC should not be interfered with by the Adjudicating Authority.”

Strengthening Our Insolvency Regime
Experts CornerNumen Law Offices

by Arush Khanna* and Swetalana Rout**

Reliance Infratel Financial Creditors
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Noting that hypothecation means the process of using an asset as collateral for a loan. It acts as a protection to the lender when the borrower does not repay the loan, the Supreme Court highlighted that the name of the document is not a decisive factor. Only because the title of the document contains the word hypothecation, it cannot be concluded that guarantee is not a part of this document.

National Company Law Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“The term “personal guarantor” is defined under Section 5(22) of the IBC as “personal guarantor” means an individual who is the surety in a contract of guarantee to a corporate debtor.”

Jaypee Infratech resolution plan
Case BriefsSupreme Court

About 538 home buyers, who paid more than 80% of the demand, will be given this option for allotment of the flat, in which event, the said home buyers will be treated on par with other home buyers.

National Company Law Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The application is filed by Jammu and Kashmir Bank against the Himalayan Mineral Waters Private Limited for a total financial debt of Rs. 50,04,38,456/- for the credit facilities availed by Leel Electricals.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court exonerated the charges of contravention of prescribing non-refundable participation fee levied on Liquidator of Corporate Debtor, however, he was found guilty of paying excess fees to BDO Restructuring Advisory LLP.

Clean Slate Doctrine
Experts CornerLakshmikumaran & Sridharan

by Yogendra Aldak†, Pranav Mundra†† and Balraaj Singh Chhatwal†††

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The NCLAT warned against manipulating the IBC for debt recovery purposes, as it would defeat the code’s purpose of rehabilitating Corporate Debtors.

Addressing Breach of Settlement Agreements
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Siddhant Asthana1

Liquidation Process
Legislation UpdatesRules & Regulations

IBBI notifies Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) (Amendment) Regulations, 2024.

national company law appellate tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“Debt acknowledgment in balance sheets and OTS proposal demonstrated Corporate Debtor’s awareness of assignment, rendering technical challenges unfounded.”

national company law appellate tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

While affirming the impugned order, the NCLAT granted the appellant option to pursue proceedings as per the agreement between the parties before an appropriate forum in accordance with the law.

national company law appellate tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The NCLAT reiterated that Commercial wisdom of the CoC is crucial in determining the viability and feasibility of a resolution plan.

national company law appellate tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The democratic principles of the determinative role of majority opinion are enshrined in the IBC, and objections by a minority within a class, when the majority has approved a resolution plan, have no legal standing.

national company law appellate tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

NCLAT held that the impugned order passed by the Adjudicating Authority is at a prima facie stage and should not be treated as a final expression of opinion.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“If in the present case, the petition is entertained, it will eventually subvert the procedure laid down under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the respondent in return will be denied the opportunity to present their case before the concerned NCLT.”

national company law appellate tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The NCLAT stated that prayers in general or in a very wide term or which is too elaborate as prayed in the applicant’s application may not require any consideration by the Adjudicating Authority.

national company law appellate tribunal
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Amount taken by the Directors of the Corporate Debtor in their personal capacity cannot be construed as ‘Financial Debt’ under S. 5(8) of the IBC.