Decoding the Public Policy of India and Patent Illegality on the Face of an Award
by Hiroo Advani†, Kanika Arora†† and Srishti Ramchandani, Vidyotma Malik†††
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 26
by Hiroo Advani†, Kanika Arora†† and Srishti Ramchandani, Vidyotma Malik†††
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 26
by Tarun Jain†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 24
United Kingdom Supreme Court: The Bench of Lord Reed, President and Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Sales, Lord Hamblen and Lord Stephens, held that
Welcome to the 13th NLU Antitrust Law Moot Court Competition, 2022 organized by National Law University, Jodhpur. The Competition is scheduled from
by Hiroo Advani†, Sheikh Yusuf Ali†† and Manav Nagpal †††
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 18
by Shalaka Patil† and Amoga Krishnan††
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 16
Supreme Court of India: The Division Bench of Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ., while deciding an appeal of the landowner, noted
Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Dinesh Maheshwari and Vikram Nath, JJ., while addressing a matter with regard to the tender document,
Supreme Court: Stating that declaration by a Court that a statute is unconstitutional obliterates that statute entirely as though it had never
Delhi High Court: Chandra Dhari Singh, J., granted bail while referring to a catena of Supreme Court decisions with regard to the
by Shubham Priyadarshi*
by Hiroo Advani†, Asif Lampwala†† and Kenneth Martin†††
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 10
“Merit is not solely of one‘s own making. The rhetoric surrounding merit obscures the way in which family, schooling, fortune and a
National Green Tribunal (Central Zone Bench): While addressing the issue of pressure/air horns and motor vehicles being driven with intolerable sound in
by Sanjay Vashishtha†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 7
by Sanjay Vashishtha†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 3
Supreme Court: Drawing an interesting analogy to explain the scope of Section 34 of IPC, the bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and
by Sucheta Sarkar†
Supreme Court: The 3-judge Bench comprising of L. Nageswara Rao, B.R. Gavai and B.V. Nagarathna*, JJ., held that though it is not
“Many people with mental health disorders are willing and able to work. However, socio-structural barriers impede their participation in the workforce. People