Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court observed that Section 201 IPC looks upon a person giving false information with intent to screen an offender as an accessory after the fact and makes him culpable as an offender committing an offence against public justice. It partly allowed the appeal against conviction under Section 201 IPC, but upheld the conviction for murder.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court observed that the convict was a young boy of 20 years, who has no father, and was shouldering the responsibility of his widowed sister and her son, hence, imprisonment for a term of 14 years would be adequate, to teach him a lesson.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Telangana High Court upheld the conviction of a husband under Section 498A of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) despite there being contradictions in the dying declarations as there were consistent statements about abuse and cruelty committed on the wife in all the dying declarations.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The conviction and sentence awarded to a man in 2003 for culpable homicide not amounting to murder has been set aside by the Delhi High Court more than 19 years after the appeal was filed, due to the persistent inability to locate or reconstruct the trial court record.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Allahabad High Court: In an appeal against the judgment passed by Trial Court, convicting the appellant/convict under Section 376 of

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In an appeal challenging the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge convicting the Father (Appellant) under

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: While deciding the instant appeal directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In an appeal filed by the accused challenging the order of conviction passed by the Trial Court

Tis Hazari Court
Case BriefsDistrict Court

“Questioning the honesty of a person is the worst form of accusation and the same can have a serious detrimental effect on the reputation of a person. It would harm the reputation of any person, and especially an advocate, in the estimation of the right-thinking members of society. There is no doubt that such a statement is per se defamatory.”

Case BriefsDistrict Court

Sessions Court, Borivali Division, Mumbai: In a case filed by a minor girl against the accused for offences under Sections 354, 354-D,

Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Allahabad high Court: In an appeal filed against the judgment and order passed by Sessions Judge, convicting and sentencing the

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Bombay High Court : In an appeal filed questioning the legality of Judgment and convicting both Appellants i.e. a father

Case BriefsDistrict Court

    POCSO Special Court, at Fort, Gr. Bombay: In a case where charge sheet is filed against the accused for offences

Case BriefsSupreme Court

    Supreme Court: In an appeal against the Karnataka High Court's reversal of acquittal of 2 out of the 22 accused

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a murder case, where the Madhya Pradesh High Court had reduced the sentence to sentence already undergone which was

Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Allahabad High Court: Samit Gopal, J. acquitted the appellant of the charges leveled against him of Section 307 of Penal

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: While deliberating upon the instant appeal challenging the conviction and sentence under Section 376, IPC [rape], the Division Bench

Orissa High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Orissa High Court: In an appeal filed challenging the Trial court ruling, convicting the accused under Section 302 of Penal

Chhattisgarh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Chhattisgarh High Court: In a case where an election was declared null and void on the grounds of non-disclosure of

Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and Ajai Tyagi, JJ. while deciding an appeal which was