Impact & implications of GST on Legal Practitioners: Clarification sought from Government
Delhi High Court: Taking note of the fact that the legal practitioners are under a genuine doubt whether they require to get
Delhi High Court: Taking note of the fact that the legal practitioners are under a genuine doubt whether they require to get
Delhi High Court: Coming down heavily upon the current Education system, the Court that the Education system has become completely dehumanised and
Delhi High Court: Deciding the issue of ban on the telecast of the BBC documentary “India’s Daughter” by the Central Government and
Delhi High Court: Dealing with the question of situs or location of intellectual property rights in logos, trade marks and brands with
Delhi High Court: Disposing of a petition which sought freezing of the symbol “elephant” as the reserved symbol of Bahujan Samaj Party, the
Delhi High Court: Deciding on the issue of legality and validity of the fee schedule prescribed by the Delhi Pollution Control Committee,
The President appointed (i) Shri Justice Parkash Singh Teji, (ii) Shri Justice Inder Singh Mehta, (iii) Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Gauba, and Smt. Justice
Delhi High Court: Disposing of a petition wherein the petitioner had sought a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents to produce
Delhi High Court: Disposing of a batch of petitions dealing with a matter of public importance involving the functioning of courts and
Delhi High Court: While dismissing a writ petition that challenged a Central Information Commission order, a single-judge bench of Manmohan, J., held
Delhi High Court: The Single Judge Bench of S.P. Garg, J cautioned the lower court Judges that the identity of the victim
Delhi High Court: A Single Bench of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J., while relying upon Punjabi University v. Union of India, 2011 SCC
Delhi High Court: Allowing the petition wherein the petitioner had sought reissuance of her daughter’s passport without insisting upon the father’s name
Delhi High Court: Disposing of an appeal filed in 1985 against a judgment and decree in a partition suit, the Court observed