Case BriefsSupreme Court

Upholding the Karnataka High Court order, the Supreme Court held that the Karnataka High Court has not committed any error in permitting the respondents to file affidavits/additional evidence in the proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. However, permitted the appellant to cross-examine and/or produce contrary evidence.

Ministry of Corporate Affairs
Legislation UpdatesRules & Regulations

On 23-1-2023, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs notified Companies (Management and Administration) Amendment Rules, 2023 to amend the Companies (Management and Administration)

Ministry of Corporate Affairs
Legislation UpdatesRules & Regulations

On 20-1-2023, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs notified the Companies (Authorized to Register) Amendment Rules, 2023 to amend the Companies (Authorized to

Ministry of Corporate Affairs
Legislation UpdatesRules & Regulations

On 20-1-2023, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs notified the Companies (Accounts) Amendment Rules, 2023 to amend the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. The

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Aparna Devkar†

Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court observed that the convict was a young boy of 20 years, who has no father, and was shouldering the responsibility of his widowed sister and her son, hence, imprisonment for a term of 14 years would be adequate, to teach him a lesson.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Bombay High Court: While hearing a challenge to the Government Notification dated 04/10/2022 changing the jurisdiction of Dept Recovery Tribunals

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a batch of petitions filed assailing proceedings initiated by the respondent- State under the Prohibition of

Case BriefsSupreme Court

    Supreme Court: The Division Bench of M.R. Shah* and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ., explained the legal propositions governing Order 6 Rule

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ and Subramonium Prasad, J. refused to transfer the civil suits pending

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court:  The Division Bench comprising Ajay Rastogi and Bela M. Trivedi, JJ., reversed the impugned judgment of the Madras High Court and held that

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Asha Menon, J., held that if no offence is attributed to the company, its Directors and other persons responsible

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: P. S. Dinesh Kumar, J., disposed of the petitions and upheld the State Government’s power and prerogative to impose

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The bench of L. Nageswara Rao and Hima Kohli, JJ has held that the formulae for fixing the percentage of

Case BriefsSupreme Court

“A rule of interpretation which produces different results, depending upon what the individuals do or do not do, is inconceivable.”

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Stating that readiness and willingness are necessary for the purpose of passing a decree of specific performance, Division Bench of

Kenya High Court
Case BriefsForeign Courts

High Court of Kenya: While deliberating upon constitutional petitions challenging the Building Bridges Initiative (hereinafter BBI) and the resulting controversial Constitution of

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Aniket Pandey*

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The 2-judge bench of AM Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ has held that for application of a subsequent legislation retrospectively