Stay of bail order
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“An order granting a stay to the operation of the order granting bail during the pendency of the application for cancellation of bail should be passed in very rare cases”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A forensic audit was conducted by Grant Thornton LLP at the request of the respondent-bank. The audit led to the withdrawal of the ‘red flagging’ of the company’s account.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It is the bounden duty of the employer to be sensitive and responsive to the physical difficulties that a working lady would face in performing her duties at the workplace while carrying a baby or bringing up the child post birth.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The brand ‘Peter England’ was introduced in 1997 and later acquired by Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. in 2000.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“There is not even a single scrap of a document placed on record by the appellant/society to show any kind of legitimacy it exercises, either over the land or the illegal structure built thereon.”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It was said that the allegations asserted did not seem to be premised on a public record document such as a criminal case that was registered or pending against Dhanya Rajendran.

Cases Reported in HCC
Cases ReportedHigh Court Cases

(2023) 2 HCC (Bom) Labour Law — Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — S. 25-O (2) — Closure of Undertaking — Whether contractual

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court asked DDA to ponder over what they have done to this city in terms of providing recreational activities open to all and how they intend to make Delhi a ‘Smart City’.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court opined that since the petition was filed after 01-07-2024, it ought to have been filed under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“When the Arbitral Tribunal is in seisin of disputes between parties, there is the pernicious possibility of any observation being made by the Court influencing the proceedings before the Arbitral Tribunal”

High Court Weekly Roundup
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Food Corporation of India issued the undated communication after various defects were noticed in the Demolition and Reconstruction of 20 Residential Flats in Sector 27, Noida.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court finds that the respondent is possessed with necessary educational qualifications and thus fulfils the requisite condition of being appointed as a ‘Teacher’.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Since the rival trade marks were visually and phonetically identical, it would cause confusion and deception amongst the general public, doctors, and chemists.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court perused the opinion of the Medical Board, which reflects that colour vision of the petitioner was normal and he was fit to be employed on the post in question.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Any third party claiming an interest in the domain name, without being bound by the INDRP, cannot allege that the award has been rendered in violation of principles of natural justice.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court finds reconsideration of respondent 1’s application for registration of the trade mark ‘CLARIWASH’ registered 14 years ago, on account of procedural error manifestly unfair.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that since the only allegation against the entity was that it was found to be non-existent, it was at liberty to furnish documents and material to support its contention that it continues to be a valid tax entity.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that ‘Electro Homeopathy’ is not a recognized form of medicine, and its analysis does not fall within the jurisdictional purview of Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia Laboratory.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court said that the scope of interference with arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has now become heavily circumscribed.