Modification of Arbitral Award
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Dr G.B. Reddy* and Dr S.B. Md. Irfan Ali Abbas**

2025 SCC Vol 4 Part 5
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 11, 12(5) and 18 — Unilateral appointment of sole arbitrator/curating panel of arbitrators: Unilateral appointment

modification of arbitral awards
Experts CornerShardul Amarchand Mangaldas

by Aashish Gupta*, Puneeth Ganapathy** and Rishab Aggarwal***

Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill 2024
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Akash Gupta* and Mahi Agrawal**

Arbitrability of Fraud in India
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Harsha Roy* and Sainaz Parveen**

Arbitration Clauses
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Abhinav Agrawal* and Deepali Poddar**

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The intention of both the parties where to go for arbitration, is at Ranchi and the proceeding after permission of the High Court was also conducted at Ranchi and in the agreement, the seat is also said to be at Ranchi. Thus, Ranchi court is having jurisdiction.

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The High Court held that the Trial Court ought to have passed separate order, in accordance with law, considering the provisions related to filing of the written statement and its forfeiture, also, keeping a view that the procedural law is handmaid of justice and the Court has the power to extend the time for filing of the written statement in the facts and circumstances of each and every case.

2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 11(6) — Substantive claims of petitioner whether time-barred i.e. issue of limitation requiring intricate evidentiary

2024 SCC Vol 10 Part 5
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

Special leave petition – Exemption from filing the certified copy of the impugned order of the High Court

2024 SCC Vol 10 Part 4
Cases ReportedSCC Weekly

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 11(6) and 37: Setting aside of order setting aside award, by Court exercising jurisdiction under

Unilateral Appointment of an Arbitrator
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Shalaka Patil† and Surbhi Shah††

Scope of judicial scrutiny at Section 11
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court clarified that the limited jurisdiction of the referral Courts under Section 11 must not be misused by parties in order to force other parties to the arbitration agreement to participate in a time-consuming and costly arbitration process.

Binding Third Parties in Maritime Arbitration
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Ansh Arora†

Gauhati High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the present case, Clause 12 of the partnership deed indicated that the Partnership Act, 1932 and its Rules shall cover only those aspects not specifically mentioned in the deed.

Plaint Based on Arbitration Clause
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Chetna Alagh1

Challenging Varindera
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Akash Hogade†

Extended Timelines
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Deepti Panda*

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Single Judge in order dated 16-07-2024 held that there are enough documents proving that appellant had started construction on Virar property even though there is a status quo order, and thus, to safeguard and preserve the property, a Court Receiver needs to be appointed.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Section 34, quite apart from its classically limited scope, is certainly not intended to be used as a tool for a litigant to desist from participating in the arbitral proceedings, despite being fully aware thereof, and, thereafter, seek a second bite at the arbitral cherry.”