“Except the two incidents wherein punishment was awarded to the petitioner, the nominal roll does not find mention of any misconduct on the part of the petitioner, after May, 2017 till date i.e. for the last more than six years.”
by Murali Neelakantan* and Gautam Narayan**
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 81
by Anuja Pethia†
The Court explained that the power to special leave is an exceptional and overriding power, naturally it must be exercised sparingly and with caution and only in very exceptional situations. It will only be used to advance the cause of justice and its exercise will be governed by well-established principles.
The accused had argued that the complainant and her family, out of ill will, had orchestrated the complaint and were extorting the petitioner for their own means and benefits. Rajasthan High Court, however, did not appreciate the fact that the previous complaints filed by the prosecutrix was closed on account of being frivolous and a closure report was also filed in the matter.
Supreme Court: In a special leave petition against the impugned judgment passed by the Bombay High Court, whereby, the Court dismissed the
Supreme Court: In a Special leave petition under Article 136 of the Constitution against a judgment passed by the High
Supreme Court of India: Observing the well-settled position of law that, Mutation Entry does not confer any right, title or interest in
by Sanjay Bansal†
by Dormaan Jamshid Dalal*
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and MR Shah has reiterated that when the main judgment of the
The applicants of all Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) can directly file a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Hon’ble Supreme Court against
Delhi High Court: An order passed by the Delhi High Court disposed off the preliminary objection to the maintainability of the review petition,