Procedural lapses do not vitiate inquiry without real prejudice: Bombay HC quashes reinstatement of school peon
The Court held that the School Tribunal’s approach was perverse as it overlooked the actual charges against the peon.
The Court held that the School Tribunal’s approach was perverse as it overlooked the actual charges against the peon.
“It is trite law that if the Arbitrator fails to decide the counter claim in accordance with law, it will vitiate the award and that it is within the Arbitrator’s jurisdiction to decide both the claim and counter claim.”
“A fundamental right, especially when it unequivocally accrues in favour of a citizen, cannot be tossed even on the basis of the procedural grounds or technicalities.”
“The present one is a case where material facts have not been disclosed by the Applicant Company, violating Section 230 (2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, which in our considered opinion is bound to prejudice the public interest at large.”
The Court reiterated that before passing any stigmatic order for removal of any employee from service, a departmental enquiry was required to be conducted.