Case BriefsSupreme Court

Upholding the Karnataka High Court order, the Supreme Court held that the Karnataka High Court has not committed any error in permitting the respondents to file affidavits/additional evidence in the proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. However, permitted the appellant to cross-examine and/or produce contrary evidence.

Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
Case BriefsDistrict Court

The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the High Court setting aside the arbitral award observing that the application for the Principle of Separability requires a binding arbitration agreement.

Gujarat High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Gujarat High Court: While deciding the instant petition, Aravind Kumar, C.J., said that the prayer for appointment of an arbitrator

Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Sanjaya Kumar Mishra and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, JJ. allowed appeals filed by the

Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Madras High Court: In an intra-Court appeal filed against the order of the single judge, whereby, the judge allowed the

rgnul
ADR Competition AnnouncementsLaw School News

    The Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution, RGNUL (CADR) is collaborating with Surana & Surana International Attorneys, headquartered in Chennai, India

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (‘A&C Act') challenging

Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Punjab and Haryana High Court: While dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellant challenging the order dated 12-12-2018 passed by the Additional

Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Rajasthan High Court: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. found that the writ petition by the petitioner lacks merit and dismissed it

Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Calcutta High Court: Shekhar B. Saraf, J. upheld the award granted by the Arbitral Tribunal holding that the award holder

Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of P.B. Suresh Kumar and C.S. Sudha, JJ., expressed that, “…compensation payable under Sections 73, 74

Experts CornerTariq Khan

by Tariq Khan†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 8

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Explaining the provision of remission under Section 34 (4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the bench of R.

Akaant MittalExperts Corner

by Akaant Kumar Mittal†

Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 1

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court: Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J., held that, Section 36 of the 1996 Act makes the arbitral award capable of

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Rajiv Shakdher and Talwant Singh, JJ., while addressing a matter with regard to the arbitral

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: On finding no ground for interference in the arbitral award, Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J., upheld the decision of Single

Advani LawExperts Corner

by Hiroo Advani† and Manav Nagpal††
Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 73

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Priyal Jain† and Prasann Malviya††

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The Division Bench of R.F. Nariman and B.R. Gavai, JJ., while addressing a significant and interesting question of law expressed