Collegium approves — elevation of 3 Advocates and 1 Judicial Officer as Judge of Kerala HC
Collegium Resolution The Supreme Court Collegium approved the proposal for elevation of the following persons as Judges of the Kerala High Court:
judicial officer
Madras HC | Order of compulsory retirement is neither a punishment nor a stigma and principles of natural justice have no role play in ordering compulsory retirement
Madras High Court: The Division Bench of R. Subbhiah and T. Krishnavalli, JJ., dismissed a writ petition filed for issuance of a
Pat HC | Necessary indices which ought to be taken into account before granting promotion to a judicial officer reiterated
Patna High Court: A Division Bench of Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ and Ashutosh Kumar, J., dismissed the petition as they did not
Supreme Court Collegium | Elevation of 1 Advocate and 2 Judicial Officers as Judges of Gauhati HC
Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting held on 15-10-2019, after taking into consideration the material on record, has approved the proposal for
SC Collegium Resolution | Elevation of an Advocate and Judicial Officers as Judges in Bombay HC
Proposal for appointment of following one Advocate and seven Judicial Officers, as Judges of the Bombay High Court ADVOCATE: 1 Shri Amit
Namibia SC | Extending liability to State for mala fide conduct of judicial officer may create far worse mischief than not extending it
Supreme Court of Namibia: The Three-Judge Bench of Shivute, CJ., Frank, AJ and Damaseb, DCJ. (dissenting), stated that making the State liable
Competent Authority under Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 should be a person who is holding or has held a Judicial Office
Supreme Court: Interpreting the provisions of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (PMP Act),