How to Register on SCC Online Advocates’ Directory
A verified professional profile can make it easier for clients, peers, and researchers to find accurate information about an advocate’s practice
A verified professional profile can make it easier for clients, peers, and researchers to find accurate information about an advocate’s practice
Introducing the SCC Online Advocates Directory, a verified professional ecosystem designed to enhance visibility, showcase legal expertise, and create a searchable database
Learn how to use SCC Online’s My Library and Browse features to access judgments, legislation, law reports, articles, treaties, and curated legal
The Court emphasised that Judges must be mindful of the impact of their actions on society at large. Dealing with lakhs of litigation is no mean task, but at the same time, Judges must realize that instances do emerge leaving absolutely no margin for error.
Celebrating the 78th Independence Day by revisiting the most historical legal achievements of the country
It is a serious matter of prima facie forgery and fabrication of order of Delhi High Court which requires investigation, the forged/fabricated order had been allegedly handed over to an undertrial prisoner by a jail visiting advocate, who has been appointed to assist and help the undertrials.
Justice N. Anand Venkatesh of Madras High Court is known within the legal fraternity for his progressive, profound and to the point judgments.
As per the fresh guidelines for the designation of Senior Advocates, there shall be no voting by secret ballot save in an exceptional situation, for reasons to be recorded.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 20 and 42 r/w S. 2(1)(e) — Jurisdictional seat of arbitration once fixed under S.
The High Court Roundup brings a curated list of the top stories of the month to ensure readers do not miss any
Let’s sail into these 124 Judgments carefully selected and briefed in the year 2021.
“The judgment replicates the individuality of the judge and therefore it is indispensable that it should be written with care and caution.”
Delhi High Court: C. Hari Shankar, J. observed that, The question of whether, once a bench of the Supreme Court has doubted
Rajasthan High Court: Rameshwar Vyas, J. allowed the transfer petition and transferred the matter to the Family Court, Ajmer. The instant transfer
Bombay High Court: G.S. Patel, J., held that the reporter or any other commentator should not deliver for public consumption a view
“After all, it is for ‘the common man’ that the judicial system exists.”
Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq and Narendra Singh Dhaddha, JJ. quashed the appeal which pointed out that the