How to Register on SCC Online Advocates’ Directory
A verified professional profile can make it easier for clients, peers, and researchers to find accurate information about an advocate’s practice
SupremeCourt
Right to Walk on Footpath is a Fundamental Right: Supreme Court
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India has held that the right to walk safely is a part of Article
Supreme Court Recognises Homemakers’ Unpaid Work; Creates ‘Loss of Domestic Care’ Compensation Head
The Supreme Court has recognised homemakers as “Nation Builders” and introduced a new compensation head, “Loss of Domestic Care”, in motor accident
Why Is Article 25 Subject to the Other Provisions of Part III? Indira Jaising Raises a Key Constitutional Question Before the Supreme Court
Why does Article 25 say it is ‘subject to the other provisions of Part III’?” Before the Supreme Court, Senior Advocate Indira
Jashandeep Kaur v. Union of India (2026): Supreme Court Regularises MBBS Admissions Amid NMC Passing Criteria Dispute
(1) A change in MBBS passing criteria left several students caught in legal uncertainty. By the time the case reached the Supreme
CJI Surya Kant Administers Oath to Five New Supreme Court Judges
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant today administered the oath of office to Justices Sheel Nagu, Shree Chandrashekhar, Sanjeev Sachdeva, Arun Palli
Supreme Court Says FIR Delay Alone Cannot Be Ground for Bail in Dowry Death Cases
In Mahesh Chand v. State of U.P., the Supreme Court cancelled bail granted in a dowry death case and reiterated that courts
SCC Online Launches Advocates Directory for Verified Legal Professionals Visibility
Introducing the SCC Online Advocates Directory, a verified professional ecosystem designed to enhance visibility, showcase legal expertise, and create a searchable database
Data Privacy, Surveillance & India’s Digital Future | Full Episode Out Now
In Episode 02 of Law, Camera & Conversations, Advocate Anusha Soni speaks with Sajan Poovayya, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India, and
Data Privacy, Surveillance & India’s Digital Future: Law, Camera & Conversations Ep. 02
What lies ahead for privacy, surveillance, AI regulation, and digital governance in India? In Episode 02 of Law, Camera & Conversations, Advocate
Permanent Establishment Doctrine Explained Through Hyatt International Case
In this video, Adv Tarun Jain, author of Goods and Services Tax: Constitutional Law and Policy explains the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling
Law, Camera & Conversations Ep. 02 Trailer: Data Privacy, Surveillance & India’s Digital Future
Coming Soon in Episode 02 of Law, Camera & Conversations by SCC Times, Advocate Anusha Soni in conversation with Sajan Poovayya, Senior
Nationwide sterilisation, Full Implementation of ABC Rules, 2023: SC issues broad directions in Stray Dogs Suo Motu Case
In July 2025, the Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of a newspaper article presenting alarming statistics on menace of stray dogs. Since then, the Court has periodically issued directions in this regard.
Sabarimala Hearing: How Courts Balance Religious Freedom and Constitutional Regulation
During arguments in the Sabarimala hearings comparative constitutional jurisprudence from the European Union Court of Justice and the House of Lords was
Sabarimala Temple Entry Review Explained: Can Non-Believers Enter Places of Worship?
On Day 9 of the Sabarimala review hearing, Advocate Nizam Pasha argued that reducing religious rights under Articles 25 and 26 to
“Rats Ate the Bribe Money?” Supreme Court Flags Serious Lapses, Grants Bail in Corruption Case| SCC Times
“Rats destroyed the bribe money” – Supreme Court says explanation does not inspire confidence. OR Missing bribe cash blamed on rodents: Supreme
Justice Rajesh Bindal Retirement Speech| Reflections of a first-generation lawyer
In his farewell address, Justice Rajesh Bindal reflects on the journey of a first-generation lawyer, the discipline of hard work, and the
SC: Wife Cannot Be Prosecuted for Giving Dowry Based on Her own complaint
In Rahul Gupta v. Station House Officer, the Court held that a woman cannot be prosecuted for giving dowry based solely on
