Seat of arbitration Archives

Seat of arbitration once fixed by the arbitration agreement, has the exclusive jurisdiction for applications u/s 11 of the A&C Act, 1996: Rajasthan High Court

“The Court observes that the ‘contrary indicia’ is clearly reflected in the present case, because the seat was mentioned as Bikaner and venue was mentioned as New Delhi.”

Case Briefs High Courts

Calcutta High Court resolves ‘Seat’ versus ‘Venue’ enigma when agreement confers ‘exclusive jurisdiction’ upon a court other than venue

Calcutta High Court dismissed the present petition on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction.

Cases Reported SCC Weekly

2023 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 20 and 42 r/w S. 2(1)(e) — Jurisdictional seat of arbitration once fixed under S.

Case Briefs High Courts

[Arbitration Agreement] Delhi High Court reiterates the law of interpretation with respect to two inconsistent clauses of a same instrument/document/deed

Where there exists any iota of inconsistency between two provisions of a same instrument, the former clause shall prevail over the latter one

Case Briefs High Courts

Delhi High Court | When a prayer to appoint an Arbitrator has been heard and rejected, the same relief cannot be sought by filing a review petition

Mere expression “place of arbitration” cannot be the basis to determine the intention of the parties that they have intended that place as the “Seat of Arbitration”