Coal Scam: Only Supreme Court can hear pleas challenging the orders of Special Courts
Supreme Court: Rejecting the plea of Naveen Jindal seeking permission to challenge the Trail Court’s order in Coal Scam, the 3-judge bench headed
Supreme Court: Rejecting the plea of Naveen Jindal seeking permission to challenge the Trail Court’s order in Coal Scam, the 3-judge bench headed
Supreme Court refused to pass interim order in the Aadhaar matter, however, it clarified that those who don’t have Aadhaar Card won’t
Supreme Court: The Bench of Ranjan Gogoi and Navin Sinha, JJ referred the matter relating to framing of guidelines for designation of
Supreme Court: In the light of the violence in the States of Tamil Nadu and Karnataka because of an order passed by
Supreme Court: In the matter highlighting the important issues concerning the entire range of conduct and management of sterilization procedures wherein women
Supreme Court: In the matter relating to the Cauvery Water Disputes, the bench of Dipak Misra and Uday U. Lalit, JJ gave
Supreme Court: Deciding the question that whether the Deputy Director of Income Tax was competent to make complaint regarding commission of offence
Supreme Court: Upholding the Constitutional validity of the provisions of Rule 3 and Rule 3-A of Chapter XXIV of the Allahabad High
Supreme Court: In the matter where the accused persons has sought for recall of the witnesses under Section 311 read with Section
Supreme Court: In the case relating to medical negligence where it was contended that the treating physician should have been well advised
Supreme Court: In a Writ Petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India praying for a declaration that the third
Supreme Court: Exploring the true purport of Art. 233(2) of the Constitution of India where the question to be decided was that
Supreme Court: In the revision petition filed against the order directing LIC to pay full back wages to it’s employees, the Court
Supreme Court: The Court was called upon to the decide the question as to whether ceiling proceedings under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling
Supreme Court: In the controversy arising due to the voice samples taken in the matter where the appellants had allegedly demanded a
Supreme Court: Hearing the reference made to resolve the conflict in the decisions reported in Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Bangalore Vs.
Supreme Court: Deciding an interesting question of law as to whether consecutive life sentences can be awarded to a convict on being
Supreme Court: The bench comprising of T.S. Thakur CJI and FM Ibrahim Kalifulla J. accepts Justice RM Lodha panel’s recommendations almost in toto
Supreme Court: In the PIL that sought for possible structural reforms in the Indian Judicial System, the bench of T.S. Thakur, CJ,
Supreme Court: Looking into the matter reflecting the manner of getting excessive number of shares in an irregular manner, adversely affecting the