Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Manmohan and Dinesh Kumar Sharma, JJ., in a matter with regard to blocking of a
Delhi High Court: Chandra Dhari Singh, J., while addressing a matter, expressed that, Under Principles of Natural Justice, it is settled law
In the Split verdict on Criminalisation of Marital Rape Exception (MRE), the Division Bench of Delhi High Court pronounced a 393-Pages Judgment,
Delhi High Court: Asha Menon, J., while setting aside the conclusion of the Metropolitan Magistrate and upholding the intervention by Sessions Court
Delhi High Court: In a split verdict the Division Bench of Rajiv Shakdher and C. Hari Shankar, JJ., laid down their opinion
Delhi High Court: In a matter wherein Starbucks trademark ‘frappuccino’ was being infringed, Jyoti Singh, J., while observing that, FRAPPUCCINO trademarks have
In the batch of petitions filed asking for striking down marital rape to be an exception under the Penal Code, 1860, Delhi
Delhi High Court will be soon pronouncing its ruling with respect to a batch of petitions filed asking for striking down marital
Delhi High Court: Asha Menon, J., held that if no offence is attributed to the company, its Directors and other persons responsible
The Supreme Court Collegium has approved the proposal for the elevation of the following Advocates as Judges in the Delhi High Court:
Delhi High Court: C. Hari Shankar, J., expressed that, Unwarranted and needless hypersensitivity is not expected of Judicial Officers, who are expected,
Delhi High Court: Prateek Jalan, J., addressed the issue of whether visits of sundry family members to the matrimonial home, without permanency
Delhi High Court: In a maintenance matter, Subramonium Prasad, J., expressed that, if a husband has sufficient means, he is obligated to
Delhi High Court: Mukta Gupta, J., expressed that the issue of whether in the absence of a third party, the refundable security
Interesting Stories of the Week [Media Trial] Can media be given right to speculate on outcome of one going investigations or Court
Delhi High Court: Mukta Gupta, J., held that, the Metropolitan Magistrate/ Judicial Magistrate of the first class is competent to take cognizance
Delhi High Court: Asha Menon, J., held that, when a Judge recuses, no litigant or third party has any right to intervene,
Delhi High Court: While addressing a matter with regard to a wife’s right to maintenance Chandra Dhari Singh, J., expressed that, only
Delhi High Court: Whether the third party can be absolved from contempt if they are informed that their conduct would violate the
Delhi High Court: Noting that, Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act intends to discourage the couples from breaking the sacred bond