Supreme Court agrees to hear the petition challenging Nitish Kumar’s Legislative Council membership
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy and A M Khanwilkar, JJ allowed the petition seeking cancellation of Bihar
Supreme Court
Bihar Liquor Ban: Liquor stock can’t be disposed of outside Bihar; To be destroyed after 31st July
Supreme Court: In the Bihar Liquor ban case, the bench of Dipak Misra and A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ dismissed a plea of the
Right to Privacy hearing: 15 big takeaways from the Union & States’ submissions
The 9-judge bench of J.S. Khehar, CJ and J. Chelameswar, S.A. Bobde, R.K. Agrawal, R.F. Nariman, A.M. Sapre, Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, S.K.
Centre to SC: We are against Cow Vigilantism; States should take action against such acts
Supreme Court: The Court asked all the States to issue affidavits on the the rising incidents of cow vigilantism across the country,
Centre & RBI to examine whether digital currency is being used for Terror funding or money laundering
Supreme Court: Showing concern over the possible misuse of Cryptocurrencies (Digital Currency) including BitCoin, the Court asked the Central government and the
Coal Scam: Only Supreme Court can hear pleas challenging the orders of Special Courts
Supreme Court: Rejecting the plea of Naveen Jindal seeking permission to challenge the Trail Court’s order in Coal Scam, the 3-judge bench headed
No interim order in Aadhaar matter; People not having Aadhaar won’t be deprived of Govt. schemes till next date of hearing
Supreme Court refused to pass interim order in the Aadhaar matter, however, it clarified that those who don’t have Aadhaar Card won’t
Matter relating to designation of Senior Advocates in the Supreme Court referred to larger bench
Supreme Court: The Bench of Ranjan Gogoi and Navin Sinha, JJ referred the matter relating to framing of guidelines for designation of
Cauvery Water Dispute: Neither any “bandh” nor any agitation can take place when court has passed an order
Supreme Court: In the light of the violence in the States of Tamil Nadu and Karnataka because of an order passed by
System of holding sterilization camps should be halted in order to strengthen the Primary Health Care centres across the country
Supreme Court: In the matter highlighting the important issues concerning the entire range of conduct and management of sterilization procedures wherein women
15,000 cusecs of water per day be released by the State of Karnataka for ten days to sustain the crops in the State of Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court: In the matter relating to the Cauvery Water Disputes, the bench of Dipak Misra and Uday U. Lalit, JJ gave
Deputy Director of Income Tax not an appellate authority for decisions/orders of Income Tax Officers
Supreme Court: Deciding the question that whether the Deputy Director of Income Tax was competent to make complaint regarding commission of offence
Rules 3 & 3-A of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 perfectly valid
Supreme Court: Upholding the Constitutional validity of the provisions of Rule 3 and Rule 3-A of Chapter XXIV of the Allahabad High
Arithmetical approach in allowing recall of witness can be dangerous
Supreme Court: In the matter where the accused persons has sought for recall of the witnesses under Section 311 read with Section
Union of India, MCI issued notice regarding prescription of guidelines for Private Hospitals to curb medical negligence
Supreme Court: In the case relating to medical negligence where it was contended that the treating physician should have been well advised
Regulation 9(2) of the Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000 giving incentive to the in-service candidates who had worked in remote and difficult areas, constitutional
Supreme Court: In a Writ Petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India praying for a declaration that the third
Bar under Article 233(2) of the Constitution only applies to ‘appointment’ and not to participation in ‘selection’ process
Supreme Court: Exploring the true purport of Art. 233(2) of the Constitution of India where the question to be decided was that
Order directing payment of full back wages to Class III & IV employees modified in the light of the immense financial burden it would cause to LIC
Supreme Court: In the revision petition filed against the order directing LIC to pay full back wages to it’s employees, the Court
No discretion is vested in the prescribed authority to re-determine surplus land by means of Section 31 of the 1976 Amendment Act
Supreme Court: The Court was called upon to the decide the question as to whether ceiling proceedings under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling