Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Wherever the life and liberty of any individual is concerned, especially in cases of couples legally marrying out of their own freewill and volition, the police is expected to act expeditiously and with sensitivity in accordance with law and take necessary measures for protection and safety of applicants concerned, if they apprehend hostility and concerns for their safety from different quarters including their own family members.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A murderer destroys the physical frame of a victim, a rapist degrades and defiles the soul of a helpless female.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: In an appeal under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (‘NIA Act’) read with Section 43-D(5)

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In an application under Section 389 read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)

Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited, seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement, passing off,

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a batch of petitions filed assailing proceedings initiated by the respondent- State under the Prohibition of

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Panasonic India Private Limited (petitioner) seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes which

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed seeking bail for an accused being involved in an alleged bank loan scam

Case BriefsHigh Courts

The trademark RAJNIGANDHA has been declared as a well-known mark by this Court and is entitled to a high degree of protection. The impugned mark is visually and structurally deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs’ trademark.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Loreal India Private Limited (petitioner) challenging the order dated 23-06-2022 passed by

Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a suit filed for injunction by the Plaintiff restraining the Defendant from selling, offering for sale,

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by the petitioner challenging dismissal order in relation to an application filed seeking

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by the petitioners challenging the vires of Section 17 of the Maintenance and

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Extramarks Education India Private Limited (petitioner) seeking appointment of an arbitrator to

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Shilpi Chaudhary (‘petitioner’) seeking quashing of FIR, which was registered alleging offences

Case BriefsHigh Courts

The permanent injunction passed shall come into effect from 1-11-2022.

Colgate
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Colgate Palmolive Company (‘plaintiff’) seeking permanent injunction, restraining infringement of trademark COLGATE,

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Lieutenant Governor (LG) of Delhi (‘plaintiff’) seeking relief of permanent injunction and

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, by an accused who happens to

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘the Act’) for