Supreme Court Bar Association Housing Society elections
Case BriefsHigh Courts

As there cannot be a vacuum in law, the process of election cannot be stalled specially, when a provision exists, whereby, fresh election has to be conducted in a particular manner.

parity in pay scales
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court regarded the High Court’s conclusion to be ‘unexceptionable’ since it did not equate two sets of employees in different organisations.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The procurement of LNG may become onerous as had happened in August and December 2022 but no irreparable loss and injury would result to the ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Clause 2.6 of the MOU signed between the parties clearly stipulates that upon termination/determination of this agreement the developer/respondent shall have no right to use any brand/mark associated with the consultants/petitioners, and/or any brand/mark identical or deceptively similar thereto, in relation to Project, expansion or part thereof.

High Court weekly Roundup-4
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

FIRs were registered on the complaints of homebuyers, who have alleged that Amrapali Leisure Valley Private Limited, Amrapali Dream Valley Private Limited, and their directors/officials, including the applicant have committed offences of cheating, fraud and criminal breach of trust in respect of various residential projects in Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court opined that, if the orders passed by this Court would not be implemented, it would lead to a situation where each department of the Government would be raising objections to the statement made by the other department.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The trade marks POLO/RALPH LAUREN/POLO PLAYER DEVICE are liable to be recognized as ‘well-known’ marks as defined under Section 2(1)(zg) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Whilst the court is not unduly bound by the texts or Order XXXVIII Rule 1 and 2 or Order XXXVIII Rule (5) or any other provisions of CPC, the substantial principles for grant of such interim measures cannot be disregarded.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“There is no injunction on Mohalla Tech (P) Ltd. using the cover versions, remixes or user generated content.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The 10% increase in MRP permissible under Para 20 of Drugs (Price Control) Order, 2013 must be calculated based on the actual MRP of the non-scheduled formulation in the preceding twelve months and not based on what was the MRP permissible for the preceding twelve months.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The slight difference in defendants’ spelling, i.e., SHRINATH or SHREENATH really makes no difference to the aspect of infringement, as plaintiffs holds a registration for the word mark ‘SHRINATH’ per se.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Chairperson as head of the Committee will decide which school is to be inspected on a particular day and an intimation in advance will be given to the members. If the member/s does not remain present at inspection time, the inspection shall be made in their absence by the Chairperson.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Ensure that the Shelter Homes established by Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board are occupied by persons who are eligible to occupy the same and not by any other persons.”

Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
Know thy Judge

Following a meticulous assessment of the qualifications, integrity, capabilities and giving due consideration to a range of factors, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended and Centre Government approved the appointment of Justice Satish Chandra Sharma as Judge of the Supreme Court of India.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The newly appointed Public Prosecutors have been provided with adequate training at the Delhi Judicial Academy; and that a proposal for a specialized academy is pending consideration with the Government of Delhi.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

As submitted by IT Team of the Law Department, the OSWS software has a built-in timeline and the maximum time within which the memos can pass through each level of officials, on the said web portal is between 3 to 7 days and the overall timeline for clearing of the bill would, therefore, be no more than 20 to 25 days.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The grievance of Patanjali Ayurved is that a video has been uploaded by respondent on the internet platforms owned by Meta Inc. having an advertisement of mens undergarments, wherein Patanjali’s trademark along with pictures of its brand ambassadors and directors are shown used unauthorizedly.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

As per an additional affidavit submitted, the CBDT has provided the way, in the past and future, pending appeals are to be dealt with and disposed of expeditiously as well as a road map to dispose of pending appeals.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The implementation of the programme/policies lies with the respective State Governments in collaboration with the Union Ministries and as such the implementation of the policies is effectively in the domain of the Government of Delhi.”