Karnataka High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Karnataka High Court: While deliberating over the instant petition seeking quashment of chargesheet filed against a “wellness therapist” under the

social media law
Case BriefsForeign Courts

    United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: While determining the constitutionality of Texas statute- House Bill 20, which

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: Navin Chawla J. restrains Facebake and Facecake based in Bangalore which sells confectionary items like cakes etc.

Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

“In today’s modern world of virtual life, most of the people are familiar with mobile technology which comes with great responsibility”

Experts CornerKhaitan & Co

by Supratim Chakraborty†
Cite as : 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 32

Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Posting & sharing unhealthy materials with unparliamentary language and remarks, etc. on social media without any solid basis cause a deleterious effect

Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Punjab and Haryana High Court: Noting the incident of prima facie hurting of religious feelings, Anupinder Singh Grewal, J., dismissed the anticipatory

Foreign LegislationLegislation Updates

On September 3, 2021, the Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Act, 2021 has come into force in Australia. The Surveillance Legislation

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: A 3-Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Dinesh Maheshwari and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. has held that representatives of Facebook

Supreme Court of The United States
Case BriefsForeign Courts

Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS): On April 1st, the 9 Judge Bench of the Court while looking into the allegations

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Mukta Gupta, J., grants ad-interim injunction while restraining defendant from posting, publishing, sharing any content which is defamatory, derogatory or

OP. ED.SCC Journal Section Archives

by Apurv Shaurya*

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of SA Bobde, CJ and AS Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ has issued notice in a PIL

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of Dipankar Datta, CJ and Madhav J. Jamdar, J., while addressing the instant Public Interest Litigation made

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madhya Pradesh High Court: Anand Pathak, J., while granting bail and directing to adhere bail conditions added a condition with regard to  “digital

Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court: P. V. Kunhikrishnan, J., addressed a matter wherein a mother uploaded a video on social media wherein she was getting

Fact ChecksNews

Nilufer Bhateja, Editorial Assistant has put this story together

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: R. Devdas, J., while addressing a bail application held that, social media has created a panic situation where a social

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: A Division bench of B.V. Nagarathna and M.G. Uma, JJ., dismissed a petition filed to call for records from

Case BriefsCOVID 19High Courts

Madras High Court: A Division Bench of M. Sathyanarayanan and M. Nirmal Kumar, JJ., while addressing a PIL held that, “With regard to