Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
Azoospermia means there is an absence of live spermatozoa in the semen. There could be various causes for such a condition, including obstruction of the tubules or ducts, i.e., the reproductive tract, or even due to infection, retrograde ejaculation or aspermatogenesis. Thus, azoospermia is categorized under two heads: obstructive and nonobstructive.
“The petitioner’s prosecution and conviction will lead to pain and tears in the eyes of the family members and future of two families will be at stake, whereas, if the impugned FIR is quashed, it would serve the ends of justice.”
“Defendant is free to use the two proposed marks, i.e., 
and 
, so long as the said marks are used in a manner where the words ‘MY’ or ‘मेरी’ are of the same font, colour and size as the word ‘RAASHEE’.”
“What are the exceptional medical grounds have not been laid down and this can lead to arbitrariness in the matter of grant of permission for such donations.”
“Petitioners were suggested to take corrective measures to ensure that entire activity of channel is under its own control and demonstrate the same through furnishing a future roadmap to align its structure and operations in accordance with the Guidelines for Uplinking and Downlinking of Satellite Television Channels in India, 2022.”
“Admitting EWS/DG students to the extent of at least 25% of the strength of its entry level class is the statutory obligation of every school which falls within Section 2(n)(iv) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.”
“Where an Act provides a complete machinery for redressal the aggrieved party is not permitted to abandon that machinery to invoke jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.”
“The products are completely dissimilar in appearance with a wide difference in the prices of the products. A consumer who uses such products would be aware of the difference between ‘Lotus Splash’ and plaintiff’s lotus family of products.”
The Court clarified that there may be cases of arbitrary exercise of power under the anti-profiteering mechanism by enlarging the scope of the proceedings beyond the jurisdiction or on account of not considering the genuine basis of variations in other factors such as cost escalations on account of which the reduction stands offset, skewed input credit situations etc.
Supreme Court noted that the right of the investigating officer to pray for further investigation in terms of Section 173 (8) is not taken away only because a chargesheet is filed under Section 173 (2) against the accused.
“One has to carefully see the nature of the publication and find out as to the content of the publication will cause prejudice to the trial of a case or not.”
“The users are being re-directed to website www.leadleacoin.com, an alleged bitcoin and cryptocurrency exchange, which is not linked with plaintiff. It appears to be an illegitimate website, intended to be used as ploy to induce users to invest substantial sums of money, being drawn using “SEQUOIA” mark.”
On perusal of the definition of “shared household” and the provisions of Sections 17 and 19 of Domestic Violence Act states that to show “shared household” the parties must show the place where they have lived together in the past.
“It is also the case of complainant that the accused persons including the petitioner had been defaming the complaint regularly through social media and the social media posts of the alleged incidents are even available on internet till date.”
The interpretation of the term other authority has evolved over a period of time where the judicial dictum, at various instances has decided for inclusion or exclusion of various authorities under Article 12 of the Constitution of India.
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
“Even if the mother is less capable financially, she becomes no less competent to ensure the welfare of the child, and the father will still be under an obligation to ensure the financial well-being of the child.”
Rahul Gandhi informed the Delhi High Court that he has taken down the tweet from 2021 that allegedly disclosed the identity and sensitive details about a minor girl.
“‘PREMIER’ as used in appellant’s mark is of a completely different font and style and has a small flower device on top of the word. Thus, concluded that there is no deceptive similarity on a bare perusal of the marks.”
“The Engineer, in terms of the Agreement, does not have the power to review the decision of 08-05-2015 made by the earlier Engineer who has adjudicated upon the issue regarding change in the liability of petitioner on account of reduced BCD.”