Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Perusal of the impugned orders indicates that it is apparently a non-speaking and unreasoned order and it nowhere mentions as to how the petitioner was responsible for the result being lower than the standard norms fixed by the respondents.”

Gujarat High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Tribunal in the impugned decision reasoned that- whenever Government for public purpose bifurcates districts, a complex situation arises and on account of the same sometimes issues like the present, escape the notice of the Government authorities therefore, good cause for condoning delay of more than 22 years was made out.

rajasthan high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is true that discipline is the hallmark of disciplinary forces like police and each and every member of the disciplinary forces are not supposed to violate the discipline by consuming liquor in public space or should arrive in public place in a drunken position.”

Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It suffered from non-application of mind and was in violation of mandatory requirement of section 75 (6) of the CGST Act.

Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Madras High Court: Anita Sumanth, J. set aside the impugned order which rejected a registration application filed under Section 22

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ. and Narayan Singh Dhanik, J. decided on a petition which was

Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai: Coram of P. Dinesha (Member)  and P. Venkata Subba Rao (Member) allowed the

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Bench of Ramalingam Sudhakar, J., allowed the appeal against an order of the Deputy Commissioner on

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Patna High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J. quashed an office order issued against a delinquent employee

Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi: A Division bench comprising of N.K. Patil, J. and S.D. Dubey (Technical Member) allowed an appeal, filed

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court: A writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order of Divisional Head Manager, UPSRTC, whereby