Op EdsOP. ED.

by Prashant Tripathi† and Sanjeev Singh††

Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court held that the petitioners are not entitled to join respondents 3 to 5 as parties to arbitral proceedings, as they do not qualify as “alter egos” of the first respondent or as successors-in-interest.

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Shivaprakash M. Nagarale†

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Simran Pahwa† and Yasha Goyal††

Karnataka High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: A Division bench of Ritu Raj Awasthi, CJ., and Suraj Govindaraj, J. issued notice to the respondent and listed

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: While addressing the issue related to jurisdiction of Court under Section 11(6) of the A&C Act, the 3-judge Bench comprising

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Mikhail Behl*

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Hiroo Advani† and Manav Nagpal††

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: Vibhu Bakhru, J., held that the scope of interference with an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration

Op EdsOP. ED.

by M. Rishi Kumar Dugar*