Call for Papers | Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, Vol 13 Issue 1
Manuscripts received during April 1 — September 30 shall be considered for publication in the January issue and manuscripts received during October 1
Manuscripts received during April 1 — September 30 shall be considered for publication in the January issue and manuscripts received during October 1
by Justice Basu Deo Agarwal*
by Juvraj Singh Bindra* and Esha Goyal**
by Vasant Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada**
Cite as: 2024 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 26
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. advised Inventurus Knowledge Solutions Limited on its offshore financing to acquire Aquity Solutions Inc. including issuance of
“It needs no re-articulation that one of the cardinal principles of arbitration is, that since arbitration is a remedy that is founded on consent of parties, the agreed procedure for appointment of an arbitrator must be scrupulously followed. However, the same is not done in the present case.”
As our Firm continues to grow and evolve, we are pleased to announce the expansion of the Management Board to nine members,
The Moot Court Association of National Law Institute University, Bhopal (‘NLIU-Bhopal’) is delighted to announce the Ninth edition of our flagship event
by Vasanth Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada**
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 89
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. has onboarded Sarika Raichur and Shruti Khanijow as partners in the General Corporate and Dispute Resolution —
05 September 2023 | New Delhi: Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas advised Morgan Stanley on the acquisition of a significant majority stake in Clearmedi
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. has announced promotions to Equity and general Partnership. The firm has promoted 8 to Equity Partnership and 18
Delhi High Court observed that in the present case, the natural resource viz. natural gas was neither ‘bought’ nor ‘sold’ as between Reliance and the Ministry; thus, the public trust doctrine was not contravened.
by Swarnendu Chatterjee† and Megha Saha††
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 41
by Prashant Tripathi† and Sanjeev Singh††
Madras High Court held that the petitioners are not entitled to join respondents 3 to 5 as parties to arbitral proceedings, as they do not qualify as “alter egos” of the first respondent or as successors-in-interest.
by Shivaprakash M. Nagarale†
by Simran Pahwa† and Yasha Goyal††
Karnataka High Court: A Division bench of Ritu Raj Awasthi, CJ., and Suraj Govindaraj, J. issued notice to the respondent and listed