Additional Amenity TDR under MRTP Act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The statutory right of the landowner under Section 126(1)(b) being twofold as discussed above, the corporation could not have conjured a precondition for the landowner to abjure part of the compensation in order to receive the other part.”

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The informant’s statement does not identify individual/s as victims whose deaths/injuries can be relatable to specific acts of commission/omission on the part of applicants before this Court.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It seemed inconceivable to the Court that a Municipal Corporation could have no responsibility or liability at all when it is demonstrated that an accident or a death has been caused due to such Corporation’s negligence.

Redevelopment Challenges
Experts CornerShardul Amarchand Mangaldas

by Ashoo Gupta†
Cite as: 2024 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 4