Homebuyers/Allottees with or without RERA orders are treated equally under Section 7(1) proviso (2) IBC: NCLAT
The NCLAT held that the appellant, having obtained a recovery certificate from RERA, qualified as Financial Creditors.
The NCLAT held that the appellant, having obtained a recovery certificate from RERA, qualified as Financial Creditors.
by Prakul Thadi* and Sarthika Singhal**
by Ashoo Gupta†
Cite as: 2024 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 4
The petitioner has contended that S. 22 of RERA Act violates the Basic Structure of the Constitution and envisages Executive predominance.
Supreme Court said that any person aggrieved by an order passed under WBHIRA will be at liberty to pursue the corresponding remedy which is available under the RERA.
ORERA reiterated that the projects which are completed and for which the completion certificate has been issued by the local or competent authority prior to the commencement of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, are not covered under the Act and therefore, has no application to such projects.
Presenting to you tour d’horizon of all the significant decisions covered in the month of December 2022 of the Tribunals, Commissions and Regulatory Bodies.
The appellant was given ample opportunity to represent and defend itself, therefore, the contention of the appellant that the authority had not complied with the RERA Rules was found to be meritless.
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | While dealing with an appeal challenging the impugned order passed by NCLT, Ashok Bhushan*, J., Dr.
The Delhi High Court held that a borrower cannot ask for alteration of contract by way of a writ petition and a contract can only be altered through mutual consent between the parties.
Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (IALS) announces Online Diploma in Housing Laws (an autonomous Diploma Course of the Indian Law
Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority: In a complaint filed for seeking directions to the respondent to handover the possession and to pay
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): The Bench of S.M. Kanitkar (Presiding Member) and Binoy Kumar (Member) while deliberating upon
Delhi High Court: In a petition filed by Jaideep Singh (’Petitioner’) for quashing of FIR registered by Shaildendra Singh (‘Respondent
Madras High Court: A Division Bench of R Mahadevan and J Sathya Narayan Prasad, JJ. upheld the constitutional validity of Government Order
18 Reports to Read Competition Commission of India (CCI) Star India providing bouquet of channels at lesser prices resulting significant loss in
Calcutta High Court: Rajasekhar Mantha, J. disposed of a petition observing that the Supreme Court is the only authority to clarify whether
by Dormaan Jamshid Dalal*
Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Mumbai (MahaRERA): While focusing on the definition of carpet area in Pre-RERA and Post-RERA, Coram of Ajoy