Justice B V Nagarathna
Know thy Judge

Justice B. V Nagarathna is currently serving as a Judge of Supreme Court of India. She formerly served as a Judge of Karnataka High Court until her elevation to the Supreme Court. Justice Nagarathna is also the potential contender for the first ever woman Chief Justice of India.

Manish Sisodia bail
Case BriefsSupreme Court

In case of a sloppy trial, the Supreme Court kept scope for Manish Sisodia to file another application for bail.

partition Hindu Law
Cases ReportedNever Reported Judgments

This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1952 on partition of Hadapsar lands under Hindu law.

Land Acquisition Compensation Rate
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court considered what would be fair and just compensation to do justice between the parties so that landowners get a fair and reasonable compensation for losing their land.

Res IPSA Loquitor
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“For applying the principles of Res Ipsa Locutor, it is necessary that a ‘Res’ is present to establish the allegation of negligence.”

pendency of cases in India
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“When millions of consumers of justice file their cases by knocking at the doors of the courts of first instance, they expect speedy justice.”

Manual Scavenging
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“For ours is a battle not for wealth or for power. It is a battle for freedom. It is the battle of reclamation of human personality.”- Dr. B. R. Ambedkar

MURDER (4)
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Thrusting upon a woman the guilt of having killed a child without any proper evidence, simply because she was living alone in the village, thereby connecting with one another two unrelated aspects; reinforces the cultural stereotypes and gendered identities which the Court has explicitly warned against.”

High Court Chief Justice
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court wondered “how a Civil Writ Petition for clubbing First Information Reports could be entertained”.

Vacant land meaning-1
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court opined that the interpretation, spirit and object of the Ceiling Act as envisaged during enactment and juxtaposed against the regressive impact experienced in different States as indicated in Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Repeal Act required authoritative determination of related issues by a Larger Bench.

Law School NewsOthers

Introduction: On 19 October 2023, the Supreme Court delivered a ground-breaking verdict on same-sex marriage. This landmark decision ignited discussions across the

witnesses turn hostile
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court found the case fit for recalling the witnesses for further cross-examination but added that the power to recall witnesses under S.311 CrPC ought to be exercised sparingly and mere hostility by a witness, per se, would not be sufficient grounds to infer misuse of concession of bail.

preventive detention grounds of detention ambiguous
Cases ReportedNever Reported Judgments

This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1952 on the Preventive Detention Act, 1950.

Pre-Institution Mediation
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Camouflage and guise to bypass the statutory mandate of pre-litigation mediation should be checked when deception and falsity is apparent or established.

AIADMK and DMK
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The PIL sought transfer of cases pending before investigating agencies to any other independent agencies or CBI.

landmark-judgment (1)
Experts CornerSiddharth R Gupta

by Siddharth R. Gupta*
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 78

Section 90(1) of Income Tax Act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Upon India entering into a treaty or protocol does not result in its automatic enforceability in courts and tribunals; the provisions of such treaties and protocols do not therefore, confer rights upon parties, till such time, as appropriate notifications are issued, in terms of Section 90(1).”

NCLAT Almost Settles the Dust
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Rishit Vimadalal†

Know thy Judge

Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, who has been serving as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India for 4 years is set to retire today, on 20-10-2023. His life has been marked by a relentless pursuit of knowledge, dedication and an unswerving commitment to uphold principles of justice.

Section 26 of NGT Act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

NGT had highlighted the serious functional irregularity in efficiency and competence on the part of CECB officials, holding them guilty of offence under Section 26 of NGT Act for failure to comply with NGT order.