2024 SCC Vol. 2 Part 1
Evidence Act, 1872 — Ss. 135 to 139, 154, 155 & 120 r/w Or. 14 R. 21, Or. 16 Rr. 14 &
Evidence Act, 1872 — Ss. 135 to 139, 154, 155 & 120 r/w Or. 14 R. 21, Or. 16 Rr. 14 &
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas advises UV Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (“UV”) in enforcement of security interest against Burnpur Cement Limited (“BCL”) in its
The Court is unable to accept that the legislative intent is to provide parallel regimes for the recovery of debts. The provisions of Section 13(10) of the SARFAESI Act, thus, cannot be interpreted in the manner as contended on behalf of the petitioner.
by Prashant Tripathi†
by Shantanu Tyagi† and Aishani Das††
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 21
Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vibhu Bakhru, J. dismissed a petition seeking a writ to be issued to set