Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court dismissed a petition seeking setting aside of sale of property conducted in violation of SARFAESI Rules, and saidthat the relief sought is within the scope of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, and not Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

agricultural land
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court opined that instead of shifting the burden of proof on the secured creditor to prove that the secured property was not agricultural property, the Telangana High Court should have laid down the burden of proof on the borrowers.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Bombay High Court: While hearing a challenge to the Government Notification dated 04/10/2022 changing the jurisdiction of Dept Recovery Tribunals

Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Rajasthan High Court: In a case where the secured creditors like Unit Trust of India (‘UTI’) and a workman have preferred their

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: Expressing that the right to travel abroad has been spelt out from the expression “personal liberty” in Article 21

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Shivam Singhal†

Appointments & TransfersNews

The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet has approved the appointment of Presiding Officers Debts Recovery Tribunals (DRTs). In a total number of

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The Division Bench of S. Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari, JJ., addressed a pertinent issue of whether the rent act

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of Sunil B. Shukre and Anil S. Kilor, JJ., held that mandate of Section 34 leaves

Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court: A.M. Badar, J., while dismissing the present petition, reiterated the observations of the Supreme Court in the words, “In

Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court: A.M. Badar, J., while addressing the instant matter held that, demand notices under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act can

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Renjith Mathew*  

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.S. Chandurkar, J. allowed a civil revision application filed by the tenant —

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The Bench of A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, JJ. allowed a writ petition filed by Presiding Officers of the Debt

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madhya Pradesh High Court: In a matter arising under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest (SARFAESI) Act,

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vineet Kothari, J., decided a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court: A Full Bench comprising of Dilip B. Bhosale, CJ, and Devendra Kumar Arora and Vivek Chaudhary, JJ., sat to