Right to cross-examine Archives

Judicial Intervention in Arbitral Proceedings

Arbitral Tribunal’s interlocutory orders not amenable to interference absent patent lack of inherent jurisdiction; Karnataka HC reiterates

Articles 226 and 227 should ordinarily not be used to correct interlocutory procedural orders of an Arbitral Tribunal unless there is a patent jurisdictional defect or exceptional perversity.

Case Briefs High Courts

S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court

“There is no bar under Section 52 of Forest Act, 1927 from appearance of Advocates in said proceedings.”

Case Briefs High Courts

MP HC | Right to cross-examine a witness cannot be curtailed, Court holds trial court should be patient and tolerant in their approach towards the Trial Court lawyers

Madhya Pradesh High Court: Subodh Abhyankar, J., allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the order whereby the right of the