attachment of property under UAPA
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court held that the purchase of the scooty cannot be said to be from the proceeds of crime on account of the self-acquired financial prowess of Appellant 1 and merely because Appellant 1 is the wife of Accused 1. The Court observed that there was a total dearth of evidence and found no reason to interfere with the earlier order and affirmed the attachment.

contempt case against advocate
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“An advocate with over 40 years of legal practice is expected to show greater restraint, if not circumspection, as he is as much an officer of the Court as the Judge presiding over it.”

arbitrary denial of payment by State
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘It is not the petitioner’s concern as to how the work was allotted to him. He/she is in no manner responsible for floating or non-floating of the tender.’

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Mere presence of the antecedents will not lead to a presumption about the active involvement of the accused in any activity, without any material proof in support.