Justice Nirzar S. Desai

IVF age limit ART Act
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court held that so long as one spouse of a “commissioning couple” satisfies the age criteria prescribed under Section 21(g), Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021, the couple cannot be denied access to Assisted Reproductive Technology services merely because the other spouse has exceeded the upper age-limit, following a consistent line of decisions of the Calcutta, Madhya Pradesh and other High Courts.

domicile certificate continuous residence requirement
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court held applicable rules did not prescribe a mandatory requirement of 10ten years’’ continuous physical residence, and such a condition could not be introduced or enlarged through executive or administrative instructions.

Gujarat High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The only aim or intention of the petitioner was to get a compassionate appointment for her son in one way or the other, i.e., without disclosing the true and correct facts regarding the financial condition of her family.”

Gujarat High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The aspirant, who crossed the age limit of 35 years contended that there was no recruitment undertaken during the year 2023-2024, though, the vacancies were available and therefore, she did not get a chance to participate.

Gujarat High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioners had completed their LL.B., but disputes had arisen as to the recognition of their college as a recognized institute.