interim protection to contractual Junior Engineers
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court dismissed the SLP challenging interim protection granted to contractual Junior Engineers, permitting them to continue in service on the same terms and conditions pending the High Court’s decision on regularization.

Continue reading
speedy trial in dowry cases
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The latest set of directives issued by the Supreme Court in pursuance of its December 2025 directions intends to address the systemic delay and ineffective implementation attending prosecutions under Sections 304-B, Section 498-A, Penal Code, 1860 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

Continue reading
Environmental Liability of Art of Living International Centre
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court held that the mere existence of environmental degradation is insufficient. A causal connection between the conduct of the alleged polluter and the environmental damage must be established.

Continue reading
SC orders Pan-India SIT probe into fraudulent motor accident claims, warns insurers against “pick and choose approach” for reporting claims
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The present proceeding initially concerned with a narrow question as to whether the vehicle stated to have caused a motor accident was in fact the vehicle involved in the accident, however, subsequently revealed a much wider concern regarding fraudulent motor accident claims in a recurring and organised pattern.

Continue reading
Satara murder case bail cancellation
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court cancels bail of Accused 3 and 4 in the Satara murder case, holding that repeated threats, prior preparation and carrying petrol indicated a pre-planned attack.

Continue reading
Maintenance waiver under matrimonial settlement
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court held that once the wife had voluntarily relinquished all monetary claims, including maintenance, revival of such claims through subsequent proceedings cannot be permitted.

Continue reading
Victim Right to Speedy Trial
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court held that Section 12, Gangsters Act does not require other criminal trials to be kept in abeyance, but only gives priority to Gangsters Act proceedings where there is a clash of dates.

Continue reading
father's liability to maintain
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court held that considering the parties’ status, the father’s admitted income and the needs of the 2 school-going daughters, maintenance of ₹60,000 per month was just and reasonable.

Continue reading
Advocate's duty of confidentiality towards former client
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court observed that both parties had “occupied the time of the Bar Council of India, a High Court and this Court for eleven years”, time, it noted, “that belonged to other litigants, waiting for reliefs they genuinely need.”

Continue reading
Pecuniary Jurisdiction of Consumer Fora
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court accepted that determining the basis of pecuniary jurisdiction is within the domain of the law-making body.

Continue reading
Justice Vinod Chandran dissent Civil Judge
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Justice K. Vinod Chandran, J., held that 3 years’ practice at the Bar is essential before entry into the judicial service, as practical courtroom experience cannot be adequately substituted by a structured training programme, and therefore found no ground to review the earlier judgment.

Continue reading
Pre-Deposit Conditions in Arbitration
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court held that “a stipulation mandating the deposit of a substantial percentage of the claim amount, as a precondition to invoking arbitration would inevitably suppress claims, deter recourse to alternative dispute resolution, and thereby defeat its very object”.

Continue reading
3-year practice rule for Civil Judge recruitment
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court modified the 3-year Bar practice requirement for recruitment as Civil Judge (Junior Division), introducing a transitional regime for fresh law graduates and prescribing 1 year of actual practice, followed by structured judicial training and Law Clerkship, for subsequent recruitments.

Continue reading
Hanging as Method of Execution
Case BriefsSupreme Court

A three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Deena v. Union of India, (1983) 4 SCC 645, specifically analysed and evaluated comparative merits of different methods of execution of death sentence and upheld the constitutional validity of hanging as mode of execution of death penalty.

Continue reading
NEET Paper Leak Protest Violence
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The HPEC which is to be headed by Justice Subhash Reddy, former Judge, Supreme Court of India, was requested to consider issues highlighted by the parties and to prioritise investigation into alleged harassment, and molestation of female protestors.

Continue reading
Saradha chit fund scam
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Supreme Court, by order dated 9 May 2014 in Subrata Chattoraj v. Union of India, (2014) 8 SCC 795, had directed the transfer of investigation into the Saradha Chit Fund Scam and other chit fund cases from the State Police to the CBI.

Continue reading
Supreme Court on oral evidence and excluded documents
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court held that the contents of documents already excluded from evidence cannot be introduced through oral testimony, while upholding the Bombay High Court’s redaction and imposing ₹10 lakh costs on RIL.

Continue reading
Supreme Court guidelines to curb black money in elections
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The right to vote freely for the candidate of one’s choice is of the essence of a democratic society, and any restrictions on that right strike at the heart of representative Government.” – Warren, CJ in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 1964

Continue reading
consortium in motor accident compensation
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court held that the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal committed a manifest error in granting only ₹5000 to the wife and not awarding any parental consortium to the children.

Continue reading
Electrocution strict liability
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court held that where material facts are disputed, the appropriate remedy ordinarily lies before the competent adjudicatory forum and not before High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Continue reading