Order II Rule 2 CPC
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The stage at which the first suit is, would not be a material consideration in deciding the applicability of the bar under Order II Rule 2. What needs to be looked into is whether the cause of action in both suits is one and the same in substance, and whether the plaintiff is agitating the second suit for claiming a relief that was very well available to him at the time of filing the first suit.”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is in the wisdom of the Investigating officer to file charge-sheet against those accused against whom there is strong evidence. Unnecessary harassment and false implication should be avoided.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The husband’s contention that the present case is not a case where the wife is hospitalised due to cruelty or harassment committed upon her, is not only unmerited but also cross the threshold of having a mentality that in a serious Section 498-A IPC cases, the woman should have injuries and medical treatment record of a hospital.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Applying the ‘eye of the needle’ test, the Court has no hesitation in observing that the prima facie scrutiny of the facts of the present case, leads to a clear conclusion that there is not even a vestige of doubt that the claim is non-arbitrable.”

Continue reading
TikTok SCOTUS
Case BriefsForeign Courts

The Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act makes it unlawful for any entity to provide certain services to distribute, maintain, or update a foreign adversary-controlled application in the United States.

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The case concerns the premature release of an individual as recommended by the State Sentence Review Board, however, the release process stalled due to pending formalities with the Judicial Department.

Continue reading
Orissa High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the matter at hand, the Family Court ordered for payment of Rs. 3,000/- maintenance. The High Court noted that without producing any proof of the infidelity of his wife, the husband simply character assassinated his wife.

Continue reading
suicide instigation
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Taking strict note of casual resorting of S. 306 IPC, the Court said that conduct of the proposed accused and the deceased, their interactions and conversations preceding the unfortunate death of the deceased should be approached from a practical point of view and not divorced from day-to-day realities of life.

Continue reading
Tripura High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The data furnished by the TSLSA are indeed alarming. And more so, since youth in a particular age group are being found to be affected by this life threatening disease.”

Continue reading
Anticipatory bail to wife for abetting suicide
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The husband and wife were married for about one and a half year, and due to continuous quarrels, the wife started living in her parental home along with their 6-month-old daughter at the time of the incident. During this period, the husband committed suicide.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Technicality cannot be attached with a notice served under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as that would defeat the objective of the statute, which provides for a speedy resolution of the disputes.”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Social media platforms, print media, other digital/non-digital mediums and other relevant intermediaries are also restrained from publishing, sharing, hosting, circulating, or promoting any further defamatory content about plaintiff.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bona fide tourists/travellers, travelling for social engagements in India with gold, which could be of a much higher value than the permissible limits, cannot to be expected to file detailed declarations, as this can make the entire process of entering India and exiting from airports extremely unfriendly or onerous.

Continue reading
toilets in court premises
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Courts should not be places, where basic needs, such as sanitation, are overlooked and neglected. The absence of adequate washroom facilities undermines equality and poses a barrier to the fair administration of justice”.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The action for suspension, removal, or dismissal of the trustee under Section 41-D of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 (‘the MPT Act’) is an independent action having no connection with the enquiry to be conducted under Section 22 of the MPT Act.

Continue reading
Benefit of Probation of Offenders Act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

There was a feud between two groups of the family which resulted in an armed clash between the groups and culminated in the filing of separate complaints by the respective groups. The High Court set aside the conviction and sentence under Sections 307, 148, and 149 of the IPC but affirmed his conviction under Sections 326, 325, 452, and 323 of the IPC.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The record shows that the petitioner (‘accused’) has committed heinous offences while he was on bail in other cases; and he has been convicted in the offences committed while on bail. When there is a long list of serious criminal involvements, the apprehension that the accused suffers from recidivism cannot be dismissed as imaginary.”

Continue reading
Medical Associate Professor promotion
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“It is well settled that no word, no phrase and no expression used in a legislation should be excluded as surplusage, while the Courts embark on a course of interpretation.”

Continue reading
Will attestation
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The instant case revolved around proving the execution of a Will, wherein the Court found that evidence presented by the Will’s propounder and scribe, did not inspire confidence.

Continue reading
Orissa High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The affidavit raising the preliminary objection stated- That as the two Judges of Larger Bench have already disagreed with the view of the earlier Division Bench, their presence in the Full Bench will be a hindrance for an independent and open mind hearing. The point of law/question of law referred to be determined cannot be fair and unbiased. That, in this premises, the view of a third Judge will be immaterial as the disagreed view of the two judges will prevail. It is just like loosing of the case by the sole respondent is preordained.”

Continue reading