High Courts

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The plea of novelty or originality must be examined vis-à-vis the date of registration of the suit design. The existence, thereafter, of any number of similar designs in the market, or even the publication of any number of similar designs, cannot indicate any want of novelty or originality in the suit design, within the meaning of Section 19(1)(c) or Section 4(a) of the Designs Act.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court observed that merely because there was no express provision in the Code of Civil Procedure, it does not mean that in-camera proceedings cannot be allowed. Therefore, the Court held that in appropriate cases, the Court may under Section 151 of the Code pass any order for carrying out the proceedings in camera if warranted by the facts and circumstances of the case.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A consumer of average intelligence and imperfect recollection who has earlier purchased and had the OREO cookie would, when he sees the FAB!O cookie pack, be clearly likely to associate the FAB!O cookie with the OREO cookie that he had earlier enjoyed (ass uming he did). That, by itself, satisfies the test of —initial interest confusion.

Continue reading
Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The High Court of Madras recognised the foreign arbitration award pronounced by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (‘SIAC’) and found that the respondents have failed to establish any ground for refusing the recognition of foreign award.

Continue reading
Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court said that the High Court cannot issue directions for speedy disposal unless there is a justification or acceptable reason for issuing any such directions. The Court concerned is expected to regulate its own procedures in respect of the cases for effective disposal.

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Calcutta High Court | While deciding a revision petition, Tirthankar Ghosh*, J. held that no offence under Ss. 417 and 426 of

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court held that even if the Contract clearly stated that before resorting to arbitration, the parties agreed to explore Conciliation by the Committee, the same cannot be held to be mandatory in nature. Further, the Court held that in case of urgency, arbitral proceedings can be initiated even when conciliation proceedings were pending.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the present case there is no allegation that the Applicant has derived or obtained any property or proceeds of crime. Additionally, there is no allegation or evidence produced to suggest that the Applicant has concealed, possessed, used, projected or claimed any proceeds of crime as untainted property.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court directed the proprietor of a small shop to pay Rs. 5 lakhs, failing which he would suffer incarceration in civil prison for a week as he violated the order of interim injunction passed earlier by the Court and continued to sell counterfeited products of louis Vuitton.

Continue reading
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner was engaged to undertake the cleaning and sweeping of the Government office premises for almost 26 years and was being paid much less than even the minimum wages paid to manual labourers. The Bombay High Court said that it t is a fit case where the State should compensate the Petitioner for violating her rights under Articles 14, 21 and 23 of the Constitution of India.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court held that the walking test of completing 25 kilometers would be an obligatory stipulation and needed to be fulfilled apart from meeting the special eligibility criteria in terms of physical requirement consistent with requirements of the identified service/post as may be prescribed by its Cadre Controlling Authority for the Indian Forest Service Examination.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Based on the weapon used for inflicting injuries to the deceased was a very heavy danda with nodes therein, the Trial Court has convicted the appellant for offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. However, it failed to appreciate the fact that the alleged offence was not committed by pre-meditation.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Mumbai blasts which are the subject matter of the reports, were one of the worst terror attacks on India, leading to hundreds of deaths and hundreds of injured persons. Thus, reports/dossiers on such investigations can have a major bearing on India’s security, sovereignty and integrity.

Continue reading
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The division bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court noted that the object of such schemes is to grant appointments to dependent family members falling under specific categories on compassionate grounds.

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Article 14 of the Constitution of India has withstood the temperts of classification and discrimination, but the emerging disparity to regulate the condition of pension as a result of service ought not to obliterate the object of equality in a level playing field.

Continue reading
Karnataka High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Karnataka High Court held that merely mentioning an individual’s caste during an altercation with no intention to insult, would not attract the provisions of the SC/ ST Act

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

To hold that conducting virginity test on a woman who is victim of sexual assault and on a woman who may be an accused of an offence will be on different footing or that the earlier will be unconstitutional and the later constitutional, will be a perverse finding and against the intent of the Constitution of India and Article 21. However, this should not mean to be taken to be a shield for the detainee from legitimate interrogation by police as per the procedure established by law.

Continue reading
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The entire trajectory of this case must be deprecated. When a principle challenge against the termination fails and while an appeal is pending, one distress warrant is challenged in Delhi only to be allegedly later withdrawn and other distress warrants are now brought before this Court.

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court held that the demand notice is illegal, as no CIC charges can be demanded from the petitioner company, if there is merely a change in the name of the original allottee/leasee company and there is no change in the ownership or shareholding of the allottee company

Continue reading
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court: In a PIL filed by the petitioner who is a social activist highlighted the issue of conduct of mock

Continue reading