Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
Madhya Pradesh High Court, vide order 11-03-2024, directed ASI survey of the complex stating that it is Constitutional and statutory obligation of the ASI to have a scientific survey.
Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court note that questions regarding the petitioner’s status in the ancestral house and the subsequent eviction suit cannot be adjudicated in Section 482 CrPC petition.
Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court noted that respondents have put the consideration of NOC on hold until the formation of a High Level Committee and implementation of a new policy.
Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court stated that what baffles the Court is “how the Registry anticipates this Bench to navigate through this labyrinthine situation, akin to unscrambling a scrambled egg”.
Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court directed the respondents to pay compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 for the mental agony and litigation costs incurred due to the incorrect measurement of her height during the Physical Standard Test.
Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court noted that the applicant has lodged 5 cases under Section 376 IPC against different persons including two cases against her husband.
Continue reading
The NCLAT warned against manipulating the IBC for debt recovery purposes, as it would defeat the code’s purpose of rehabilitating Corporate Debtors.
Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court held that contractual engagement does not confer a vested right of employment to workers engaged through placement agencies.
Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court noted that wife compelling the husband to do household chores, not preparing food on time, going to the market for shopping purposes, etc., are trivial dispute within domestic life.
Continue reading
NCLAT held that CoCs’ resolution not to consider Resolution Plans from additional new entrants rendered the NCLAT’s orders unsustainable.
Continue reading
The National Green Tribunal deemed the personal appearance of authorised officers from Ghaziabad Municipal Corporation and Ghaziabad Development Authority necessary for the next hearing.
Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court noted that petitioner, a police officer, was a member of the party which was deputed to nab a dreaded anti-social element of Uttar Pradesh, namely Kamaluddin.
Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court emphasised on the seriousness of the matter, highlighting the need for proper investigation and accountability within the police department.
Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court reiterated that the burden of proof lies with the petitioners to demonstrate the incorrectness of the disputed answers.
Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court expressed concern over State’s lethargic approach which jeopardized the interests of litigants and undermined the functioning of the justice system.
Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court held that the respondent has no authority to make a discrimination among the similarly situated employees for no good reason.
Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court held that retiral benefits are earned by employees for their services and should not be deprived due to non-job-related legal matters.
Continue reading
“Disobedience of the Court orders strikes at the very root of the Rule of Law and the judicial orders are bound to be obeyed at all costs.”
Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court held that the offence under Section 494 IPC requires proof of remarriage during the lifetime of a spouse, which is not the case in present matter.
Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court decided to entertain the appeal due to the significant question of the application’s maintainability.
Continue reading