Shri Justice Pavan kumar Bhimappa Bajanthri transferred as an Additional Judge of Punjab and Haryana High Court On 16-03-2015, Shri Justice Pavan kumar Bhimappa Bajanthri, Additional Judge of the Karnataka High Court was transferred as an Additional Judge of Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram More Print (Opens in new window) Print Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Published on March 18, 2015October 14, 2015By Sucheta On 16-03-2015, Shri Justice Pavan kumar Bhimappa Bajanthri, Additional Judge of the Karnataka High Court was transferred as an Additional Judge of Punjab and Haryana High Court. He will assume charge of the new office on or before 17-03-2015. -Ministry of Law and Justice Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram More Print (Opens in new window) Print Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Related Tags : Transfer Leave a comment
Case Briefs, High Courts ‘AMPT Road to be in top condition’; Meghalaya HC directs State PWD to undertake complete overhauling
SCC Times Newsflash, WATCH NOW Amishi Arora, Amity University, Noida at the 9th EBC-SCC Online Student Ambassador Conclave 2026
Call For Papers, Law School News MNLU-CS | Call for Papers: Volume IV Issue II of Journal for Dispute Resolution
Case Briefs, High Courts Resignation does not end anti-defection proceedings: Madras HC on AIADMK MLAs who resigned and later joined TVK
Law Firms News, News Khaitan & Co. advises JSW Steel and JSW Cement on JSW One Platforms’ proposed ₹30,540.10 Million IPO
Case Briefs, High Courts Mere non-return of Stridhan insufficient for S. 406 IPC without specific entrustment or dominion; Delhi HC quashes S. 406 proceedings, allows S. 498A case to continue