Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
The Court said that the parties had reached a stage from where they cannot reconcile themselves, bury their differences and live together forgetting their past as a bad dream.
The Court said that Section 498-A is being rampantly misused by the complainants and all the family members are roped in the complaint only with a view to harass them.
Patanjali suffered loss of about Rs. 63,23,732 due to delivery of less quantity of RBD Palm Olein.
Gujarat High Court has directed to undertake the medical termination procedure with all due care and precautions.
The Gujarat Wind Solar Hybrid Power Policy, 2018 is set to expire on 19-06-2023.
The Court said that a person may like or dislike any person, but it does not mean that he may start using derogatory and abusive language for the Prime Minister of the Country and his late mother.
The Gujarat High Court said that if a person has failed to possess the prescribed eligibility, he cannot claim participation in the selection process.
The Court noted that the Doctor was in the habit of issuing the Medical Certificates in the name of different hospitals to aid prisoners in filing applications for bail before the Court of law.
Lieutenant-Governor of Delhi was alleged of assaulting Narmada Bachao Andolan activist Medha Patkar.
The Court found that the conviction and life sentencing order suffered from patent infirmities and was based on presumptions.
The Court also said that the CAT, Ahmedabad, did not have jurisdiction under rule 6(1) of Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1987, as the show cause notice was issued from New Delhi.
The Court ordered the authorities to not remove the slum dwellers from the land till the representation of the slum dwellers is decided and pass an appropriate order by 09-06-2023.
When there is prima facie satisfaction that there is something more than a mere needle of suspicion against the accused, the Court cannot jeopardise the investigation, more so when the allegations are grave in nature.
It was alleged by the petitioner that different yardsticks cannot be applied selectively to deprive a candidate, who is eligible and entitled for promotion.
When a redevelopment scheme is in the interest of public at large, the entire project cannot be put to a standstill at the behest of few persons (14 petitioners) when 75% of the occupants have consented to the redevelopment process.
Gujarat High Court held that a writ cannot be issued to direct the authorities to complete the reappointment process on time
Gujarat High Court: While deciding the instant petition, Aravind Kumar, C.J., said that the prayer for appointment of an arbitrator