Why did Madras HC Judge refuse to recuse from an Illegal Mining Case? Read an all-inclusive report
Madras High Court: B. Pugalendhi, J., while refusing to recuse from the present case reminded himself of the harsh criticism of Justice V.R.
Madras High Court
Madras HC | Order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal modified; Court doubles the compensation finding it erroneous
Madras High Court: Abdul Quddhose, J., partly allowed an appeal that had been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation granted
Supreme Court Collegium approves proposal for elevation of 10 Judicial Officers as Judges of Madras HC
Supreme Court Collegium Supreme Court Collegium on 23-09-2020, approved the proposal for elevation of the following Judicial Officers, as Judges of the
Madras High Court to start Physical Court hearings partially on trial basis from 7th September, 2020
Physical Court Hearing Administrative Committee of the Madras High Court has decided to open physical court hearing partially with 6 Division Benches
Fact Check: Has the Madras High Court issued any order to waive rent from April to June?
Nilufer Bhateja, Editorial Assistant has put this story together
Lockdown | Madras HC resolves to continue extension of restricted functioning of HC & Subordinate Courts till 30th April, 2020
In view of the persisting status of the Corona Virus Pandemic, particularly as reported in the State of Tamil Nadu, and the
SC Collegium recommends transfer of — Justice Subramonium Prasad from Madras HC to Del HC
Supreme Court Collegium recommends the transfer of Justice Subramonium Prasad, Judge, Madras High Court to Delhi High Court. He was Elevated as
Madras HC | President accepts Justice Vijaya Kamlesh Tahilramani resignation from the office of Chief Justice
Justice Vijaya Kamlesh Tahilramani has tendered her resignation from the office of the Chief Justice of the Madras High Court, in pursuance
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination | Madras High Court allows life convict Nalini to appear in person to argue on plea for leave
As reported by PTI, the Division Bench comprising of M.M Sundaresh and M. Nirmal Kumar, JJ. gave permission to Nalini, who is
Madras HC | 6 Additional Judges appointed as Permanent Judges
President appointed following Additional Judges of the Madras High Court as Permanent Judges: Justice V. Bhavani Subbaroyan Justice A.D. Jagdish Chandira Justice
SC | Collegium recommends 6 Additional Judges of Madras HC to be appointed as ‘Permanent Judges’
Proposal for appointment of following six Additional Judges of the Madras High Court, as Permanent Judges of that High Court: 1. Mrs
Madras HC | Appointment of Additional Judge
President appointed Shri Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, to be an Additional Judge of the Madras High Court for a period of two years with
Appointment of Additional Judges, Madras High Court
The President in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 224 of the Constitution of India appointed Kumari P.T.
CBSE directed to declare NEET results for admission to MBBS and BDS Courses; Madras HC’s order stayed
Supreme Court: Staying the order of the MAdras High Court that stayed the declaration of results of NEET examination for admission in
Central and State Governments should endevour to enlighten people to go for pre-marital counseling/ medical examination
Madras High Court: Expressing dismay upon the suffering of the petitioner due to her marriage being conducted without a proper enquiry as
Family Courts are not allowed to enlarge the scope of enquiry under S. 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act
Madras High Court: While deciding upon an appeal against the order and decree passed by the Family Court, Tirunelveli, the Division Bench
Cancellation of a bail order by a Judge acting like an ‘inanimate computer’, without adhering to the principles of natural justice is a serious issue
Madras High Court: Reviving a bail order cancelled by the Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai, the bench of P. Devadass J. held that,
Appellate Authorities cannot condone delay beyond the limits specified in the statute
Madras High Court: This division bench of S. Manikumar and D. Krishnakumar, JJ held that there can be no order for condonation
State is not responsible for a person’s suicide due to hike of fees charged by Private Schools
Madras High Court: In the matter where the deceased had killed one of his children before committing suicide due to the exorbitant
Petition challenging the validity of Section 18 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, dismissed
Madras High Court: While deciding upon the issues involving the constitutionality of Section 18 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED)