Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘While the victim/complainant has a right to be heard in the revision proceedings, such right does not upscale itself to a right to be impleaded in the said criminal revision’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court said that the winding up proceedings which have not progressed to an advanced stage before the High Courts, ought to be transferred to the NCLT.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Respondent submitted that present petition is not maintainable, at this stage, in view of the bar under Article 329(b) of the Constitution and the petitioner has the remedy of filing an election petition after the elections are over.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court refrained from taking any coercive action against advocate for contempt of Court in view of his medical condition.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court said that in a suit for partition and possession, a relief of declaration sought by way of amendment is impermissible as it would change nature of suit.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Since the Petitioner made an inexplicable delay in filing the petition for reallocation of land by DDA after receiving license fee, the petition deserves to be dismissed on account of delay and laches.

High Court weekly Roundup
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.

Cases Reported in HCC
Cases ReportedHigh Court Cases

Bombay High Court Service Law—Upgradation of Pay—Petition against denial of financial upgradations under the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) and the Modified

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court noted that there was a delay in forwarding the punishment inquiry to the Inspecting Judge, which contravened Rule 1273 of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court says that being a government employee, the appellant cannot be permitted to be free by merely contending that the accounts, though in his name, were being managed by the co-accused.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Since the parties to disputes were closely related to each other and the dispute between parties was amicably settled, instead of imposing the costs upon the petitioner, he is directed to plant 30 saplings of trees.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court found it fit to grant a Dynamic+ injunction to keep up with the hydra-headed nature of the infringement actions of the websites.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“If the engines are not returned and properly serviced, TWC Aviation Capital Ltd. would suffer irreparable harm, as this could cause irreversible damage to the engines.”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petitioner’s daughter is a child belonging to DG in the SC category within the meaning of Section 2(e) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (“the RTE Act”) and is, therefore, entitled to free, compulsory and elementary education till its completion under Section 12(c) of the RTE Act.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court stated that since the legislature in its wisdom has elected to impose this duty on the manufacturer and the pharmacist, we do not find any ground for issuing a direction as prayed for in this PIL as it would amount to judicial legislation.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The aviation sector being a capital-intensive sector, the regulated free play given to the airlines to implement dynamic pricing of the fares for each flight appears to be in conformity with the norms followed worldwide and appears to be essential growth of the said sector.”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It would be a travesty if the entitlement of the family members of the deceased scavenging workers is confined to Rs.10,00,000. The same would defeat the directions of the Supreme Court to enhance the compensation to Rs. 30,00,000/- on the basis that the previously fixed compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- was fixed far back in 1993 and was not an adequate compensation.”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The present case is one where there are special circumstances, for the Central Government to use the enabling powers, as contemplated under Section 5(4) for favorably considering grant of citizenship to the Petitioner.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Notwithstanding the abolition of IPAB and the power of rectification reverting to the High Court, a Trial Judge would have to stay in its hands once it is apprised of pendency of a rectification.