Reflections on Criticality of Show-Cause Notice in Tax Laws
by Tarun Jain†
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 80
by Tarun Jain†
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 80
Supreme Court inaugurates monthly newsletter — Supreme Court CHRONICLE.
Supreme Court rejected the argument that requirement to hold 1 year diploma in specified courses was not an essential qualification, since the same was indicated in 2014 Rules as well as the advertisement so concerned.
“Sexual harassment in any form at the workplace must be viewed seriously and the harasser should not be allowed to escape from the clutches of law.”
After applying the rule that all the contemporaneous documents are to be read together, to discern the true purport of the contract, Supreme Court said that the parties intended assignment of the debt, i.e., the rents payable.
Allahabad High Court opined that the reasoning of the order dated 05-11-2019, that there is no ‘cutting’ or ‘overwriting’ in the petitioner’s service book, does not close all avenues of inquiry.
The impugned Act can only apply to games of chance and not games of skill. Hence, the Act in its entirety, need not be held to be ultra vires
“This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1952 on dishonestly receiving stolen property.”
Great expectations followed Justice Dr DY Chandrachud when he was elevated to the post of Chief Justice of India. As 1 year has gone by in Justice Dr Chandrachud’s 2-year tenure, one thing is clear that interesting times are afoot indeed!
Supreme Court said that the litigation which should close at the trial level is taken up to the Supreme Court and the parties are forced to litigate.
The instant application sought issuance of appropriate directions for the Rajasthan State and District Administration of Udaipur to take immediate steps to prevent air pollution in Udaipur city.
“IBC does not suffer from any manifest arbitrariness to violate Article 14 of the Constitution”
Supreme Court issued notice in the present SLP and tagged it with SLP titled Rohan Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Berger Paints India Ltd.
by Shubham Priyadarshi†
Supreme Court reiterated that a co-ordinate Bench cannot comment upon the judgment rendered by another co-ordinate Bench of equal strength and that subsequent decision or a judgment of a co-ordinate Bench or larger Bench by itself cannot be regarded as a ground for review.
“Residents of Delhi are grappling with health problems year after year because we cannot find a solution to the issue. It requires immediate attention and Court monitoring, irrespective of whether the matter improves or not”
“The nature of the offence against the petitioner is itself an extremely minor offence under IPC. For the non-disclosure of this offence, she has already suffered since in the first round of selection in 2017. To punish her again for the same reason in the next selection process is not justified.”
Supreme Court also sought assistance from Attorney General for India, R. Venkataramani.
Supreme Court issued notice on the transfer petition filed by Tejashvi Yadav seeking to transfer the defamation case from Gujarat to a neutral place.
This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1952 on specific performance in imperfect title.