Court cannot quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC relying on assumptions
Orissa High Court: While deciding the issue that whether it would be proper to quash the criminal proceedings against the petitioner in
Orissa High Court: While deciding the issue that whether it would be proper to quash the criminal proceedings against the petitioner in
Tripura High Court: While deciding upon the present writ petition wherein the petitioner’s appointment in Group- D post was cancelled by the
Hyderabad High Court: In the instant appeal, the question arose that whether a counter-claim can be rejected in terms of Order
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, CJ and AM Khanwilkar and Dr. DY Chandrachud, JJ, explaining the principles governing the
Supreme Court: Taking Suo Motu cognizance in respect of inadequacies and deficiencies in criminal trials, the bench of S.A. Bobde and L.
Madhya Pradesh High Court: In the instant case filed for the quashment of criminal proceedings initiated against the applicants under Sections 498-A
Supreme Court: In the case where the review petition preferred in 2012, was kept pending for almost four years and, thereafter, the
Supreme Court: Taking note of the problem of delay in disposal of trials, the bench of A.K. Goel and U.U. Lalit, JJ
Supreme Court: With a view to provide an alternative to seeking transfer of proceedings on account of inability of a party to
Delhi High Court: The Court dealt with an important question of law in criminal proceedings in a case, where the process under
Delhi High Court: The Divisional Bench of Badar Durez and Ashutosh Kumar, JJ. while disposing of an appeal gave relief to party
Karnataka High Court: While hearing bail petition of an accused who was demanding bail on ground of lack of evidence, the Single-Judge
Kerala High Court: While deciding upon the issue that whether the lawyer who is appearing for a party can be removed at