Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
Supreme Court said that the civil suit filed at the instance of the respondents for taking possession of the subject land is pending for the last 32 years and has not started its journey yet, this is called the travesty of injustice to a person who is indisputedly the title holder and still unable to enjoy the property.
Delhi High Court observed that the petitioner was enrolled as an advocate in 2010 and he fulfils the requirement of “continuously practicing as an advocate for not less than 7 years on the last date of receipt of applications”.
Delhi High Court observed that the respondent is a law graduate enrolled with the State Bar Council and despite being aware of the binding nature of the orders of the Court has shown scant regard for the legal process.
To make the company viable, the unsecured creditor would have to sacrifice to some extent otherwise the revival efforts would fail, observed the Supreme Court..
The impugned arbitral award was passed without considering the clauses of the Concessionaire Agreement while adjudicating on the rate of interest to be granted, thus, suffers from infirmity and patent illegality.
The PIL seeks formulation and implementation of a scheme that conclusively addresses the grievances of other home buyers who may not have the capacity to approach courts/forums to seek redressal against builders.
It was alleged that each alleged ‘dishonour’ comprised of a separate offence and even if committed on the same date (i.e., within the same year), not more than 03 such offences can be tried by way of a single complaint in view of section 219 Cr.P.C. There is no legal clarity on bar of filing more than three cheques in Section 138 of the NI Act complaint as per Section 219 CrPC; Delhi High Court issues notice to NCTD.
The Collaboration Agreement is a commercial transaction between the private parties and hence the same by its very nature is determinable, even if there is termination clause in the Collaboration Agreement
The Union decision is contrary to the FDI Policy of the Government of India and contrary to the guidelines laid down by the Union Ministry of Civil Aviation.
Departmental action is a serious issue that can affect the career of police personnel or any other public official for that matter and to make observations/directions in a cursory and casual manner is unwarranted.
The petition was filed by the sister of Mr. Raghwendra Pratap Singh, an Indian national who has been arrested in Uzbekistan and is hereby seeking consular access and legal representation.
The Court was of the view that the purpose of the trials was to ensure that the best sports persons participate in the championship and the exclusion of National Games appeared to have adversely affected the petitioners.
These are valuable lands to which these documents relate and thus, the missing of such records has a significant bearing on the rights of citizens and there is a threat of misuse of the documents.
National Law University, Delhi has appointed Sanjay Vashishtha as standing counsel of NLUD at Delhi High Court. Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha is
The present PIL was filed by the National Federation of the Blind challenging the inaction on the part of the State (respondent) in filling up the vacancies which are reserved for Blind and Low Vision candidates.
The Delhi High Court upheld the order of ASJ to register an FIR under the provision of the Information Technology Act, 2000 against the petitioner, however, clarified that the same does not include the direction to arrest any of the accused or petitioner.
The Central Government Standing Counsel apprised the Court of the order dated 02-03-2023 which had set aside the order dated 26-03-2021 and remanded back the matter to the Passport office for re-examination.
It is the case of the prosecution that the present applicant helped other Chinese nationals who were responsible for building the loan app and facilitating the opening of bank accounts of non-existent companies for the transfer of duped money.
Delhi High Court observed that no issue regarding the validity of the registrations of trademarks of the plaintiff is liable to be framed in the facts and circumstances of the present case.