Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Respondents have not taken recourse to the procedure contemplated by Section 7 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers Drug-Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981, which provides for procedure to be adopted in case where the detenue is absconding.

Continue reading
Acquittal of Constable in murder
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“It must be established that all the accused had preplanned and shared a common intention to commit the crime with the accused who has actually committed the crime.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court observed that there has been an inordinate delay on the part of the Government of NCT of Delhi in taking requisite steps for laying the CAG Reports before the Legislative Assembly.

Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Live-in-relationship is an agreement in which two persons live together in a short or long term relationship. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 does not recognise the concept of live-in-relationship. Even in Muslim Law, no recognition has been given to such relationship.”

Continue reading
Conviction under S. 498A IPC
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court considered that the complainant-wife had re-married and settled abroad. However, directed for compensation of Rs. 3,00,000/- to the former wife in view of the harassment which she was subjected to.

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kolkata is widely known and recognized for literary works. There are similar fairs and events, may not be of the same scale, organized in various parts of the State. The petitioners would be hardly prejudiced if they are not able to participate in the subject fair. The petitioners can always showcase their books and news articles elsewhere and there is absolutely no restriction in doing so.

Continue reading
Section 37 of Arbitration Act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Section 37 of the 1996 Act grants narrower scope to the appellate court to review the findings in an arbitral award if it has been upheld or substantially upheld under Section 34.”

Continue reading
legitimacy paternity
Case BriefsSupreme Court

An ‘additional’ access or ‘multiple’ access does not automatically negate the access between the spouses and prove non-access thereof.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The language in the legal notice completely scandalises the Court and raises baseless allegations and aspersions against the administration of justice by the Court by raising doubts about the functioning of the Registry of this Court.

Continue reading
Private complaint before Tribunal
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s decision quashing the private complaint and concluding that the alleged offences under Sections 193, 199 and 200 of the IPC were such, on which the complaint could have only been filed by the Court following the route under Section 195 read with Section 340 of the CrPC.

Continue reading
filthy language insult modesty
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“It will be essential for the Court to carefully assess the evidence presented, in order to determine whether there is sufficient material to establish the intention and knowledge to insult the modesty of the complainant or, whether any act was intended to shock the sense of decency of the complainant being a woman”.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is a stark reminder of an unfortunate reality frequently observed by courts, where acts of sexual assault against children were often committed by individuals who occupy positions of trust or confidence in the child’s life. Such relationships of familiarity and trust not only provide perpetrators access to the child but also magnify the betrayal and lasting impact of the crime.”

Continue reading
Christian man's appeal to bury deceased father
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Given the lack of consensus between the Judges, the Court exercising its power under Article 142 directed the appellant to perform the funeral rites and bury his deceased father at the burial ground at another village.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court held that the petitioner approached the Court raising hue and cry about the violation of the principle of natural justice with an oblique motive to create a defence at the appellate stage, immediately after the culmination of the proceedings before the Consumer Forum.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Sarpanch is a post conferred upon a person and therefore, the term ‘Sarpanch’ as well as the post of Sarpanch cannot be distinguished as both have identical meanings in common parlance.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Consideration to condone can be made only if there is a reasonable explanation and the condonation cannot be merely because the appellant is a Government body where procedural and bureaucratic delays are well known.”

Continue reading
Chhattisgarh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“In a selection process, the scope of the candidates for participation should not be narrowed down by imposing unwarranted conditions rather more candidates should be allowed to participate so that better qualified candidates may be selected.”

Continue reading
Royalty on brick earth
Case BriefsSupreme Court

On 01-06-1958, the Government of India published a notification in the exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(e) of the Mines and Mineral (Regulations and Development) Act, 1957 by which brick earth was declared a minor mineral within the meaning of the 1957 Act.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Men who are victims of violence at the hands of their wives often face unique difficulties, including societal disbelief and the stigma associated with being perceived as a victim. Such stereotypes perpetuate the erroneous belief that men cannot suffer violence in domestic relationships.

Continue reading
election dispute caste of returned candidate
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The matter revolved around the respondent questioning the petitioner’s election to Jagaluru Vidhan Sabha Constituency contending that the petitioner did not belong to Scheduled Tribe but belonged to the Other Backward Community.

Continue reading