High Courts

Punjab and Haryana High Court: While deciding the question that whether prohibiting the entry of an Amritdhari Sikh carrying a Kripan (ceremonial

Delhi High Court: Hearing a writ petition filed by an acid attack victim pleading for Rs. 50 lacs as compensation, reimbursement of

Madras High Court: Perusing through the present case where the school authorities denied a student from giving exams on the ground that

Kerala High Court:  Answering the reference in the affirmative, the Full Bench reaffirmed that the appointments to the posts of Principal and

Chhattisgarh High Court:  The Bench of Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. has categorically held that the role of the Chhattisgarh Lok Aayog under

Allahabad High Court: Adjudicating upon the question referred as to whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution can be

Madras High Court: Taking a landmark step, the Division Bench of the Court comprising of S.K. Kaul, C.J. and M.M. Sundresh, J.,

Karnataka High Court: Responding to the growing cries against the amendment, which introduced Lifetime Tax for outside vehicles staying within Karnataka for

Madras High Court: Grabbing the opportunity to clarify the legal position with regard to child marriage, the Division Bench of S. Manikumar

Rajasthan High Court: While coming down heavily upon the jail authorities the Court observed that the food provided to the prisoners is

Allahabad High Court:  The Division Bench of  Dr D. Y. Chandrachud, C.J. and Yashwant Varma, J. has held that an application by

Delhi High Court: Facing serious allegations of sexual harassment, stalking and criminal intimidation against a colleague Research Analyst, Dr. Rajendra K. Pachauri,

Chhattisgarh High Court: The Single Bench of Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. has held that the Special Courts constituted under Section 14 of

Delhi High Court: In an elaborately reasoned order, the Single Bench of Pratibha Rani J. granted six months interim bail to JNUSU

Karnataka High Court: The Bench of  Justice A.V. Chandrashekara has allowed  the petition filed by the state under section 439(2) Cr.P.C. by

Delhi High Court: Much to the disappointment of the Telcos, a Division Bench of Rohini C.J. and Jayant Nath J. upheld the

Kerala High Court: Deciding upon the maintainability of the petition, it was held that High Court cannot asume jurisdiction based on the

Chhattisgarh High Court: Deciding upon the issue as to whether the State Government was justified in impliedly excluding married daughter of affected/displaced