Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court held that a writ petition against a show-cause notice is generally not maintainable, as established in Union of India v. Kunisetty Satyanarayana, (2006) 12 SCC 28.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Since the rival trade marks were visually and phonetically identical, it would cause confusion and deception amongst the general public, doctors, and chemists.

Continue reading
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The physical contact made by the accused with the girls coupled with the words uttered by him could only lead to one inference that the touch was with sexual intent.

Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that the petitioner’s failure to provide sufficient details and his criminal background further undermined his petition

Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted that the additional issue which states that “whether the registered sale deed dated 13.7.2017 was illegally executed” already covers all the ingredients which are necessary for execution of a valid sale deed.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court perused the opinion of the Medical Board, which reflects that colour vision of the petitioner was normal and he was fit to be employed on the post in question.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Any third party claiming an interest in the domain name, without being bound by the INDRP, cannot allege that the award has been rendered in violation of principles of natural justice.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that granting such relief would cause injustice to other applicants who were similarly situated as the petitioner and who could not submit their applications by the prescribed deadline.

Continue reading
Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court made the Superintendent of Police of the District concerned responsible if the identity of the minor victim girl or the personal details are revealed to the outside world.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court referred to Jolly George Varghese v. Bank of Cochin, (1980) 2 SCC 360 quoting Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer that “to be poor, in this land of Daridranayan, is no crime, and to recover debts by the procedure of putting one in prison is too flagrantly violative of Article 21 unless there is proof of the minimal fairness of his wilful failure to pay in spite of his sufficient means”.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court finds reconsideration of respondent 1’s application for registration of the trade mark ‘CLARIWASH’ registered 14 years ago, on account of procedural error manifestly unfair.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that since the only allegation against the entity was that it was found to be non-existent, it was at liberty to furnish documents and material to support its contention that it continues to be a valid tax entity.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court opined that the applicant has a bright future and is apprehensive of the stigma of conviction that may ruin his future, therefore, it was expedient to release him on probation under the Section 4 benefit

Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that “if an FIR is registered prior to 01-07-2023 under the CrPC, it would amount to a pending enquiry/investigation within the meaning of Section 531(2)(a) of BNSS.”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court reiterated the findings of the Supreme Court in State of Maharashtra v. Milind, (2001) 1 SCC 4, that the benefits drawn by a candidate not belonging to a scheduled tribe, must be considered to having been drawn on the basis of a false caste certificate; such benefits are required to be withdrawn.

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The impugned order is a stereotype order which is passed in almost every case by the State Government without application of mind.”

Continue reading
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

There was no occasion for the State to file the present appeal, as once it is on record that the prosecutrix was living happy married life with the respondent, then, this Court cannot shut its eyes to the ground reality and disturb the happy family life of the respondent and the prosecutrix.

Continue reading
Patna High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court opined that it may not be proper to look at specific questions and the answers pointed out by the different petitioners and to re-evaluate each of them. Thus, the Court restrained from detailed examination of the objections raised, but for completeness, it dwelled upon specific contentions.

Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court set aside the SDO’s order, and subsequent appellate decisions and remanded back the case to the SDO for a fresh enquiry.

Continue reading
Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Parliament, after considering a spate of reports highlighting the flourishing human organ trade in India and the consequential exploitation of the economically vulnerable segments of the society through organ removal, and illegal transplants, for prohibiting the unethical practice, enacted the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994”

Continue reading